Andrew R. Craig

1.1k total citations
39 papers, 775 citations indexed

About

Andrew R. Craig is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew R. Craig has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 775 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 13 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Andrew R. Craig's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (35 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (17 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers). Andrew R. Craig is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (35 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (17 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (13 papers). Andrew R. Craig collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Andrew R. Craig's co-authors include Timothy A. Shahan, Wayne W. Fisher, Henry S. Roane, Mary M. Sweeney, C. R. Gallistel, John A. Nevin, Gregory J. Madden, Brian Greer, Valdeep Saini and Ashley M. Fuhrman and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, Behavioural Brain Research and Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

In The Last Decade

Andrew R. Craig

37 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew R. Craig United States 17 674 545 171 118 103 39 775
Corina Jimenez‐Gomez United States 15 433 0.6× 331 0.6× 177 1.0× 160 1.4× 79 0.8× 45 683
Carlos R. X. Cançado United States 12 378 0.6× 244 0.4× 64 0.4× 61 0.5× 50 0.5× 32 446
Brent Alsop New Zealand 17 560 0.8× 554 1.0× 202 1.2× 117 1.0× 414 4.0× 54 1.1k
Anthony P. McLean New Zealand 18 570 0.8× 293 0.5× 108 0.6× 133 1.1× 59 0.6× 49 787
Nancy S. Hemmes United States 18 384 0.6× 550 1.0× 54 0.3× 75 0.6× 44 0.4× 44 820
Benjamin C. Mauro United States 8 420 0.6× 278 0.5× 49 0.3× 67 0.6× 88 0.9× 12 512
Elbert Blakely United States 12 491 0.7× 280 0.5× 61 0.4× 70 0.6× 75 0.7× 21 615
Thom Verhave United States 15 879 1.3× 421 0.8× 111 0.6× 71 0.6× 77 0.7× 29 1.0k
Lawrence T. Stoddard United States 22 1.3k 1.9× 994 1.8× 86 0.5× 80 0.7× 206 2.0× 42 1.7k
Raymond C. Pitts United States 13 277 0.4× 149 0.3× 280 1.6× 27 0.2× 95 0.9× 49 504

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew R. Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew R. Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew R. Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew R. Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew R. Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew R. Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew R. Craig. The network helps show where Andrew R. Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew R. Craig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew R. Craig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew R. Craig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew R. Craig. Andrew R. Craig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Roane, Henry S., et al.. (2025). An analysis of renewal following fading of reinforcer type. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 123(3). 400–411. 1 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Sean W., Paul Johnson, Andrew R. Craig, et al.. (2025). Cortisol as a Biomarker for Stress During the Assessment and Treatment of Destructive Behavior. Behavioral Sciences. 15(4). 475–475.
4.
Mitteer, Daniel R., et al.. (2024). Reinforcement‐schedule thinning practices during functional communication training: A survey of behavior analysts. Behavioral Interventions. 39(3). 6 indexed citations
5.
Fuhrman, Ashley M., Wayne W. Fisher, Brian Greer, Timothy A. Shahan, & Andrew R. Craig. (2021). Resurgence following traditional and interdependent differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.. Behavioral Development. 26(1). 29–42. 7 indexed citations
6.
Greer, Brian, et al.. (2020). Resurgence following differential reinforcement of alternative behavior implemented with and without extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 113(2). 449–467. 22 indexed citations
7.
Craig, Andrew R., et al.. (2019). Further evaluation of a nonsequential approach to studying operant renewal. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 112(2). 210–223. 17 indexed citations
8.
Gallistel, C. R., Andrew R. Craig, & Timothy A. Shahan. (2019). Contingency, contiguity, and causality in conditioning: Applying information theory and Weber’s Law to the assignment of credit problem.. Psychological Review. 126(5). 761–773. 28 indexed citations
9.
Craig, Andrew R. & Wayne W. Fisher. (2019). Randomization tests as alternative analysis methods for behavior‐analytic data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 111(2). 309–328. 38 indexed citations
10.
Fisher, Wayne W., et al.. (2019). Treatment of resistance to change in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 52(4). 974–993. 12 indexed citations
11.
Nevin, John A., et al.. (2017). Quantitative models of persistence and relapse from the perspective of behavioral momentum theory: Fits and misfits. Behavioural Processes. 141(Pt 1). 92–99. 51 indexed citations
12.
Craig, Andrew R., et al.. (2017). Longer treatment with alternative non-drug reinforcement fails to reduce resurgence of cocaine or alcohol seeking in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 341. 54–62. 29 indexed citations
13.
Shahan, Timothy A. & Andrew R. Craig. (2016). Resurgence as Choice. Behavioural Processes. 141(Pt 1). 100–127. 115 indexed citations
14.
Craig, Andrew R., et al.. (2016). Higher rate alternative non-drug reinforcement produces faster suppression of cocaine seeking but more resurgence when removed. Behavioural Brain Research. 306. 48–51. 32 indexed citations
15.
Nevin, John A., F. Charles Mace, Iser G. DeLeon, et al.. (2016). Effects of signaled and unsignaled alternative reinforcement on persistence and relapse in children and pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 106(1). 34–57. 38 indexed citations
16.
Craig, Andrew R., et al.. (2015). Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 103(3). 437–449. 12 indexed citations
17.
Shahan, Timothy A., Andrew R. Craig, & Mary M. Sweeney. (2014). Resurgence of sucrose and cocaine seeking in free-feeding rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 279. 47–51. 10 indexed citations
18.
Craig, Andrew R., et al.. (2014). Do the adjusting-delay and increasing-delay tasks measure the same construct. Behavioural Pharmacology. 25(4). 306–315. 26 indexed citations
19.
Gallistel, C. R., Andrew R. Craig, & Timothy A. Shahan. (2013). Temporal contingency. Behavioural Processes. 101. 89–96. 21 indexed citations
20.
Craig, Andrew R.. (2010). Self-Administered Behavior Modification to Reduce Nail Biting: Incorporating Simple Technology to Ensure Treatment Integrity. Behavior Analysis in Practice. 3(2). 38–41. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026