Andrew Pryde
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Chromatography in Natural Products
Papers in
-
- Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry 2
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 4
- Co-authors
- John H. Knox (1 shared paper)G. R. Knox (2 shared papers)Mary T. Gilbert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Chromatography A (3 papers)Journal of Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers)Biochemical Society Transactions (1 paper)Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Chromatographic Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew Pryde
10 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Spectroscopy 271
- Analytical Chemistry 133
- Filtration and Separation 9
- Biomedical Engineering 134
- Complementary and alternative medicine 14
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pryde
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pryde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pryde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pryde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pryde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pryde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pryde. The network helps show where Andrew Pryde may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Pryde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1975 | 218 | |
| 2 | 1974 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 45 | |
| 4 | Applications of High Performance Liquid Chromatography | 1979 | 15 |
| 5 | 1974 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1978 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1975 | 1 |
About Andrew Pryde
Andrew Pryde is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (2 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (1 paper), Analytical chemistry methods development (1 paper) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (271 citations), Analytical Chemistry (133 citations), Filtration and Separation (9 citations), Biomedical Engineering (134 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (14 citations). Andrew Pryde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John H. Knox, G. R. Knox and Mary T. Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of Chromatographic Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.