Andrew Pike

1.3k total citations
21 papers, 619 citations indexed

About

Andrew Pike is a scholar working on Insect Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Pike has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 619 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Insect Science, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Pike's work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (12 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (7 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers). Andrew Pike is often cited by papers focused on Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (12 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (7 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers). Andrew Pike collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Andrew Pike's co-authors include George Dimopoulos, Yuemei Dong, Stephen K. Chapman, Gillian Reid, Euan Gordon, Guowu Bian, Annie E. Hill, Zhiyong Xi, Simone L. Sandiford and Chris M. Cirimotich and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Pike

18 papers receiving 610 citations

Peers

Andrew Pike

IS

PHEOH

MB

IMMUN

EE

Rong‐Long Pan Taiwan

Gemma Harris United Kingdom

Özlem Önder United States

Eva Horáková Czechia

Randy L. Allen United States

Neta Holland Israel

Pablo Smircich Uruguay

Robert Sabatini United States

Gregor Meiß Germany

Juliana S. G. Fischer Brazil

Rong‐Long Pan Taiwan

Andrew Pike

56 ×0.2

IS

52 ×0.2

PHEOH

292 ×1.4

MB

101 ×0.6

IMMUN

13 ×0.2

EE

Citations per year, relative to Andrew Pike Andrew Pike (= 1×) peers Rong‐Long Pan

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Pike

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Pike

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Pike. The network helps show where Andrew Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Pike. Andrew Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Dong, Yuemei, Seokyoung Kang, Simone L. Sandiford, et al.. (2025). Targeting the mosquito prefoldin–chaperonin complex blocks Plasmodium transmission. Nature Microbiology. 10(4). 841–854.

2.

Parker, Michael, et al.. (2024). Is anybody watching: A multi-factor motivational framework for educational video engagement. Computers & Education. 222. 105148–105148.

3.

Pike, Andrew, et al.. (2022). Online Courses Provide Robust Learning Gains and Improve Learner Confidence in the Foundational Biomedical Sciences. Medical Science Educator. 32(6). 1425–1432.

4.

Pike, Andrew & George Dimopoulos. (2018). Genetic modification of Anopheles stephensi for resistance to multiple Plasmodium falciparum strains does not influence susceptibility to o’nyong’nyong virus or insecticides, or Wolbachia-mediated resistance to the malaria parasite. PLoS ONE. 13(4). e0195720–e0195720. 4 indexed citations

5.

Pan, Xiaoling, Andrew Pike, Deepak Joshi, et al.. (2017). The bacterium Wolbachia exploits host innate immunity to establish a symbiotic relationship with the dengue vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. The ISME Journal. 12(1). 277–288. 98 indexed citations

6.

Pike, Andrew, et al.. (2017). Changes in the microbiota cause genetically modified Anopheles to spread in a population. Science. 357(6358). 1396–1399. 50 indexed citations

7.

Angleró-Rodríguez, Yesseinia, Benjamin J. Blumberg, Yuemei Dong, et al.. (2016). A natural Anopheles-associated Penicillium chrysogenum enhances mosquito susceptibility to Plasmodium infection. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 34084–34084. 34 indexed citations

8.

Sandiford, Simone L., Yuemei Dong, Andrew Pike, et al.. (2015). Cytoplasmic Actin Is an Extracellular Insect Immune Factor which Is Secreted upon Immune Challenge and Mediates Phagocytosis and Direct Killing of Bacteria, and Is a Plasmodium Antagonist. PLoS Pathogens. 11(2). e1004631–e1004631. 48 indexed citations

9.

Hamm, Christopher A., et al.. (2014). WolbachiaInfection and Lepidoptera of Conservation Concern. Journal of Insect Science. 14(6). 1–8. 4 indexed citations

10.

Pike, Andrew, et al.. (2014). Characterization of the Rel2-regulated transcriptome and proteome of Anopheles stephensi identifies new anti-Plasmodium factors. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 52. 82–93. 15 indexed citations

11.

Hamm, Christopher A., et al.. (2014). Wolbachia infection and Lepidoptera of conservation concern. Journal of Insect Science. 14(1). 6–6. 17 indexed citations

12.

Dong, Yuemei, Chris M. Cirimotich, Andrew Pike, Ramesh Chandra, & George Dimopoulos. (2012). Anopheles NF-κB-Regulated Splicing Factors Direct Pathogen-Specific Repertoires of the Hypervariable Pattern Recognition Receptor AgDscam. Cell Host & Microbe. 12(4). 521–530. 80 indexed citations

13.

Hughes, Grant L., Andrew Pike, Ping Xue, & Jason L. Rasgon. (2012). Invasion of Wolbachia into Anopheles and Other Insect Germlines in an Ex vivo Organ Culture System. PLoS ONE. 7(4). e36277–e36277. 24 indexed citations

14.

Guo, Xiang, Yao−Zhong Xu, Guowu Bian, et al.. (2010). Response of the mosquito protein interaction network to dengue infection. BMC Genomics. 11(1). 380–380. 43 indexed citations

15.

Bosch, Robert & Andrew Pike. (2009). Map-Colored Mosaics. 139–146. 2 indexed citations

16.

Longueville, Françoise de, Dominic Surry, Georgina Meneses‐Lorente, et al.. (2002). Gene expression profiling of drug metabolism and toxicology markers using a low-density DNA microarray. Biochemical Pharmacology. 64(1). 137–149. 59 indexed citations

17.

Gordon, Euan, et al.. (2000). Identification and characterization of a novel cytochrome c3 from Shewanella frigidimarina that is involved in Fe(III) respiration. Biochemical Journal. 349(1). 153–153. 58 indexed citations

18.

Mowat, Christopher G., R. C. E. Durley, Andrew Pike, et al.. (2000). Kinetic and Crystallographic Studies on the Active Site Arg289Lys Mutant of Flavocytochrome b₂ (Yeast l-Lactate Dehydrogenase). Biochemistry. 39(12). 3266–3275. 21 indexed citations

19.

Gordon, Euan, et al.. (2000). Identification and characterization of a novel cytochrome c3 from Shewanella frigidimarina that is involved in Fe(III) respiration. Biochemical Journal. 349(1). 153–158. 43 indexed citations

20.

Pike, Andrew, Forbes Manson, Stephen K. Chapman, & Gillian Reid. (1995). Investigating the importance of a salt-bridge in flavocytochrome b2 interdomain electron transfer. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 59(2-3). 270–270. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact