Andrew McKeown

563 total citations
25 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Andrew McKeown is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew McKeown has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Andrew McKeown's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers). Andrew McKeown is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers). Andrew McKeown collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Andrew McKeown's co-authors include Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Shannon M. Smith, Michael McDermott, Bob A. Rappaport, Matthew Hunsinger, Jennifer S. Gewandter, Nathaniel P. Katz, Mark R. Williams and Allison H. Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

In The Last Decade

Andrew McKeown

25 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Andrew McKeown
Andrea Licari United States
M. Lavender United Kingdom
Fadi Al Zoubi Canada
David Reilly United Kingdom
Kate Jackson Australia
Helene Moustgaard Denmark
Cliona O’Riordan Ireland
Kathrin Jobski Germany
Caitlin R Finley Canada
Paul Di Capua United States
Andrea Licari United States
Andrew McKeown
Citations per year, relative to Andrew McKeown Andrew McKeown (= 1×) peers Andrea Licari

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew McKeown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew McKeown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew McKeown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew McKeown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew McKeown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew McKeown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew McKeown. The network helps show where Andrew McKeown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew McKeown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew McKeown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew McKeown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew McKeown. Andrew McKeown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fyfe, Molly, et al.. (2021). Exploring why medical students still feel underprepared for clinical practice: a qualitative analysis of an authentic on‐call simulation. BMC Medical Education. 21(1). 165–165. 14 indexed citations
2.
Stewart, Claire, et al.. (2021). The rOSCE: A remote clinical examination during COVID lockdown and beyond. MedEdPublish. 10(1). 11–11. 2 indexed citations
3.
McKeown, Andrew, et al.. (2019). UK longitudinal integrated clerkships: where are we now?. Education for Primary Care. 30(5). 270–274. 18 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Mark R., Andrew McKeown, Matthew Hunsinger, et al.. (2016). Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Trials of Intravenous and Invasive Pain Treatments: An ACTTION Systematic Review. Journal of Pain. 17(11). 1137–1149. 10 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Shannon M., Florence Paillard, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2015). Instruments to Identify Prescription Medication Misuse, Abuse, and Related Events in Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review. Journal of Pain. 16(5). 389–411. 23 indexed citations
6.
Dworkin, Jordan D., Andrew McKeown, John T. Farrar, et al.. (2015). Deficiencies in reporting of statistical methodology in recent randomized trials of nonpharmacologic pain treatments: ACTTION systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 72. 56–65. 11 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Shannon M., Matthew Hunsinger, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2015). Quality of Pain Intensity Assessment Reporting: ACTTION Systematic Review and Recommendations. Journal of Pain. 16(4). 299–305. 34 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Mark R., Andrew McKeown, Franklin Dexter, et al.. (2015). Efficacy Outcome Measures for Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials in Adults. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 122(1). 152–170. 18 indexed citations
9.
10.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Shannon M. Smith, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2015). Reporting of adverse events and statistical details of efficacy estimates in randomized clinical trials of pain in temporomandibular disorders. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 146(4). 246–254.e6. 8 indexed citations
11.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Andrew McKeown, Michael McDermott, et al.. (2014). Data Interpretation in Analgesic Clinical Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Analyses: An ACTTION Systematic Review. Journal of Pain. 16(1). 3–10. 36 indexed citations
12.
McKeown, Andrew, Jennifer S. Gewandter, Michael McDermott, et al.. (2014). Reporting of Sample Size Calculations in Analgesic Clinical Trials: ACTTION Systematic Review. Journal of Pain. 16(3). 199–206.e7. 20 indexed citations
13.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Michael McDermott, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2014). Reporting of intention-to-treat analyses in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Pain. 155(12). 2714–2719. 10 indexed citations
14.
Hunsinger, Matthew, Shannon M. Smith, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2014). Adverse event reporting in nonpharmacologic, noninterventional pain clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review. Pain. 155(11). 2253–2262. 22 indexed citations
15.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Michael McDermott, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2014). Reporting of missing data and methods used to accommodate them in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Pain. 155(9). 1871–1877. 32 indexed citations
16.
17.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Shannon M. Smith, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2014). (262) Reporting of primary analyses and multiplicity adjustment in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Journal of Pain. 15(4). S41–S41. 22 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Shannon M., Anthony Pereira, Daniel R. Chang, et al.. (2013). Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcome specifications in analgesic trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Pain. 154(12). 2769–2774. 24 indexed citations
19.
Hunsinger, Matthew, Shannon M. Smith, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2013). Disclosure of authorship contributions in analgesic clinical trials and related publications: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Pain. 155(6). 1059–1063. 6 indexed citations
20.
Gewandter, Jennifer S., Shannon M. Smith, Andrew McKeown, et al.. (2013). Reporting of primary analyses and multiplicity adjustment in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations. Pain. 155(3). 461–466. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Licari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Lavender Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fadi Al Zoubi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Reilly Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kate Jackson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Helene Moustgaard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cliona O’Riordan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathrin Jobski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Caitlin R Finley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul Di Capua
Rankless by CCL
2026