Andrew Lister
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Oncology top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- John RadfordBarry W. HancockPeter HoskinPaul SmithA. Z. S. RohatinerPeter JohnsonAnthony J. SwerdlowDavid C. Linch
- Topics
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers)Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (9 papers)Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew Lister
40 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.0k
- Oncology 531
- Genetics 417
- Neurology 344
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 333
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Lister
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Lister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Lister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Lister more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Lister
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Lister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Lister. The network helps show where Andrew Lister may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Lister
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Lister. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Lister based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Lister. Andrew Lister is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Results of a Trial of PET-Directed Therapy for Early-Stage Hodgkin’s Lymphomabreakdown → | 407 |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 103 | |
| 14 | 318 | |
| 15 | 233 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 71 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Andrew Lister
Andrew Lister is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics and Hematology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (9 papers) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.0k citations), Genetics (417 citations) and Neurology (344 citations). Andrew Lister has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Radford, Barry W. Hancock, Peter Hoskin, Paul Smith, A. Z. S. Rohatiner, Peter Johnson, Anthony J. Swerdlow, David C. Linch, Alan Horwich and David Cunningham. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.