Andrew Keats
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eugene YeeFue‐Sang LienRéal D’AmoursSai Manoj Pudukotai DinakarraoAmlan GangulyLev TarasovHua JiMin‐Der Lin
- Topics
- Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers)Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Andrew Keats
15 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Environmental Engineering 252
- Global and Planetary Change 111
- Atmospheric Science 96
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 72
- Insect Science 49
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Keats
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Keats's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Keats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Keats more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Keats
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Keats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Keats. The network helps show where Andrew Keats may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Keats
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Keats. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Keats based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Keats. Andrew Keats is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Efficacy, environmental persistence and nontarget impacts of pyriproxyfen use against Aedes vigilax in Australia. | 4 |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Validation of Bayesian Inference for Emission Source Distribution Reconstruction Using the Joint Urban 2003 and European Tracer Experiments | 2 |
| 14 | 223 | |
| 15 | 22 |
About Andrew Keats
Andrew Keats is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Engineering and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (252 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (47 citations) and Atmospheric Science (96 citations). Andrew Keats has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Eugene Yee, Fue‐Sang Lien, Réal D’Amours, Sai Manoj Pudukotai Dinakarrao, Amlan Ganguly, Lev Tarasov, Hua Ji, Amlan Ganguly, Min‐Der Lin and Chien‐Lung Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Atmospheric Environment, Climate Dynamics and Ecological Modelling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.