Frank Russo

7.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
143 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Frank Russo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frank Russo has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 51 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 30 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Frank Russo's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (66 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (44 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (43 papers). Frank Russo is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (66 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (44 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (43 papers). Frank Russo collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frank Russo's co-authors include Steven R. Livingstone, William Forde Thompson, Arla Good, Lucy M. McGarry, Gillian M. Sandstrom, Deborah I. Fels, Philip Graham, Marshall Chasin, M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller and Lena Quinto and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Frank Russo

125 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

The Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frank Russo Canada 31 1.9k 1.6k 942 807 436 143 3.5k
Petri Laukka Sweden 31 3.2k 1.7× 2.7k 1.7× 1.4k 1.5× 1.7k 2.1× 421 1.0× 80 5.7k
Catherine Stevens Australia 26 1.7k 0.9× 788 0.5× 313 0.3× 1.1k 1.4× 252 0.6× 157 3.1k
William Forde Thompson Australia 38 4.6k 2.4× 1.9k 1.2× 1.2k 1.3× 1.6k 2.0× 504 1.2× 191 6.0k
Emery Schubert Australia 30 2.2k 1.2× 960 0.6× 736 0.8× 1.1k 1.3× 305 0.7× 139 3.1k
Petri Toiviainen Finland 34 3.1k 1.6× 843 0.5× 1.8k 1.9× 957 1.2× 1.2k 2.6× 136 4.2k
Tuomas Eerola United Kingdom 41 4.0k 2.1× 1.5k 0.9× 1.6k 1.7× 1.7k 2.1× 795 1.8× 153 5.2k
Daniel Müllensiefen United Kingdom 27 2.1k 1.1× 654 0.4× 675 0.7× 633 0.8× 355 0.8× 119 2.7k
Elvira Brattico Denmark 45 5.4k 2.8× 1.8k 1.1× 951 1.0× 1.6k 2.0× 171 0.4× 182 6.1k
Jessica A. Grahn Canada 29 4.4k 2.3× 1.6k 1.0× 512 0.5× 956 1.2× 216 0.5× 93 5.9k
Emmanuel Bigand France 40 4.4k 2.3× 1.4k 0.9× 1.5k 1.6× 864 1.1× 474 1.1× 132 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Frank Russo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Russo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Russo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Russo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Russo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Russo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Russo. The network helps show where Frank Russo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Russo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Russo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Russo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Russo. Frank Russo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Singh, Gurjit, et al.. (2024). On-beat rhythm and working memory are associated with better speech-in-noise perception for older adults with hearing loss. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 678167012–678167012.
2.
Russo, Frank, et al.. (2023). Brightening the Study of Listening Effort with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Scoping Review. Seminars in Hearing. 44(2). 188–210. 9 indexed citations
3.
Singh, Gurjit, et al.. (2022). A Scoping Review and Field Guide of Theoretical Approaches and Recommendations to Studying the Decision to Adopt Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing. 44(3). 460–476. 5 indexed citations
4.
Sharma, Vivek, Michael H. Thaut, Frank Russo, & Claude Alain. (2022). Absolute pitch: neurophysiological evidence for early brain activity in prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex. 33(10). 6465–6473. 2 indexed citations
5.
Picou, Erin M., Gurjit Singh, & Frank Russo. (2021). A Comparison between a remote testing and a laboratory test setting for evaluating emotional responses to non-speech sounds. International Journal of Audiology. 61(10). 799–808. 4 indexed citations
6.
Russo, Frank, et al.. (2021). Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Vibrotactile Beat Perception and Bimodal Enhancement. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33(4). 635–650. 4 indexed citations
7.
Good, Arla & Frank Russo. (2021). Changes in mood, oxytocin, and cortisol following group and individual singing: A pilot study. Psychology of Music. 50(4). 1340–1347. 16 indexed citations
8.
9.
Sharma, Vivek, Michael H. Thaut, Frank Russo, & Claude Alain. (2021). Neural Dynamics of Inhibitory Control in Musicians with Absolute Pitch: Theta Synchrony as an Oscillatory Signature of Information Conflict. Cerebral Cortex Communications. 2(3). tgab043–tgab043. 2 indexed citations
10.
Goy, Huiwen, et al.. (2019). Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Measure of Listening Effort in Older Adults Who Use Hearing Aids. Trends in Hearing. 23. 2760898434–2760898434. 30 indexed citations
11.
Singh, Gurjit, et al.. (2018). The Emotional Communication in Hearing Questionnaire (EMO-CHeQ): Development and Evaluation. Ear and Hearing. 40(2). 260–271. 17 indexed citations
12.
Picou, Erin M., Gurjit Singh, Huiwen Goy, et al.. (2018). Hearing, Emotion, Amplification, Research, and Training Workshop: Current Understanding of Hearing Loss and Emotion Perception and Priorities for Future Research. Trends in Hearing. 22. 2759814927–2759814927. 32 indexed citations
13.
Goy, Huiwen, M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller, Gurjit Singh, & Frank Russo. (2018). Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification. Trends in Hearing. 22. 2759813448–2759813448. 21 indexed citations
14.
Good, Arla, Karen A. Gordon, Blake C. Papsin, et al.. (2017). Benefits of Music Training for Perception of Emotional Speech Prosody in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants. Ear and Hearing. 38(4). 455–464. 72 indexed citations
15.
Good, Arla & Frank Russo. (2016). Singing Promotes Cooperation in a Diverse Group of Children. Social Psychology. 47(6). 340–344. 53 indexed citations
16.
Trehub, Sandra E., Judy Plantinga, & Frank Russo. (2015). Maternal Vocal Interactions with Infants: Reciprocal Visual Influences. Social Development. 25(3). 665–683. 51 indexed citations
17.
Good, Arla, et al.. (2014). The efficacy of singing in foreign-language learning. Psychology of Music. 43(5). 627–640. 66 indexed citations
18.
Tierney, Adam, Frank Russo, & Aniruddh D. Patel. (2011). The motor origins of human and avian song structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(37). 15510–15515. 56 indexed citations
19.
Thompson, William Forde, et al.. (2010). Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 64(2). 381–393. 7 indexed citations
20.
Chasin, Marshall & Frank Russo. (2004). Hearing Aids and Music. PubMed. 8(2). 35–47. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026