Andrew J. Hoover

956 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 786 citations indexed

About

Andrew J. Hoover is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Molecular Biology and Inorganic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew J. Hoover has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 786 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Inorganic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Andrew J. Hoover's work include Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers). Andrew J. Hoover is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers). Andrew J. Hoover collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Andrew J. Hoover's co-authors include Nelo R. Rivera, Kazunori Nagao, David Hesk, Ian W. Davies, David W. C. MacMillan, Steven L. Colletti, Scott E. Denmark, Matthew T. Burk, Peter G. Dormer and Haifeng Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

In The Last Decade

Andrew J. Hoover

8 papers receiving 778 citations

Hit Papers

Photoredox-catalyzed deuteration and tritiation of pharma... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew J. Hoover United States 6 415 415 334 125 62 8 786
Göran N. Nilsson Sweden 10 599 1.4× 276 0.7× 442 1.3× 216 1.7× 83 1.3× 12 860
Lee Kingston United Kingdom 12 361 0.9× 202 0.5× 187 0.6× 125 1.0× 25 0.4× 34 525
Yuxuan Ding China 12 166 0.4× 228 0.5× 165 0.5× 115 0.9× 26 0.4× 24 394
Rolf H. Taaning Denmark 21 259 0.6× 1.5k 3.6× 506 1.5× 314 2.5× 37 0.6× 26 1.8k
Sydonie D. Schimler United States 10 442 1.1× 619 1.5× 240 0.7× 124 1.0× 24 0.4× 11 825
Joseph R. Clark United States 13 162 0.4× 662 1.6× 291 0.9× 107 0.9× 26 0.4× 26 873
Remo Weck Germany 14 601 1.4× 168 0.4× 384 1.1× 141 1.1× 86 1.4× 23 666
Feng‐Lian Zhang China 26 478 1.2× 1.8k 4.3× 297 0.9× 181 1.4× 20 0.3× 48 2.0k
Stig D. Friis Denmark 19 244 0.6× 1.5k 3.7× 609 1.8× 294 2.4× 31 0.5× 26 1.9k
Laura C. Paterson United Kingdom 9 253 0.6× 178 0.4× 194 0.6× 80 0.6× 37 0.6× 19 398

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Hoover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Hoover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Hoover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Hoover. The network helps show where Andrew J. Hoover may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Hoover

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Hoover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Hoover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Hoover. Andrew J. Hoover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hoover, Andrew J., et al.. (2023). Matcher: An Open-Source Application for Translating Large Structure/Property Data Sets into Insights for Drug Design. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 63(7). 1852–1857. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ren, Sumei, Patrick S. Fier, Hong Ren, et al.. (2018). 34S: A New Opportunity for the Efficient Synthesis of Stable Isotope Labeled Compounds. Chemistry - A European Journal. 24(28). 7133–7136. 4 indexed citations
3.
Yang, Haifeng, Peter G. Dormer, Nelo R. Rivera, & Andrew J. Hoover. (2018). Palladium(II)‐Mediated C−H Tritiation of Complex Pharmaceuticals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 57(7). 1883–1887. 52 indexed citations
4.
Yang, Haifeng, Peter G. Dormer, Nelo R. Rivera, & Andrew J. Hoover. (2018). Palladium(II)‐Mediated C−H Tritiation of Complex Pharmaceuticals. Angewandte Chemie. 130(7). 1901–1905. 11 indexed citations
5.
Nagao, Kazunori, Andrew J. Hoover, David Hesk, et al.. (2017). Photoredox-catalyzed deuteration and tritiation of pharmaceutical compounds. Science. 358(6367). 1182–1187. 461 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Boucher, Yves, Hao Liu, Diêgo S. Ferreira, et al.. (2016). Noninvasive Assessment of Losartan-Induced Increase in Functional Microvasculature and Drug Delivery in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Translational Oncology. 9(5). 431–437. 43 indexed citations
7.
Hoover, Andrew J., Mark Lazari, Hongliang Ren, et al.. (2016). A Transmetalation Reaction Enables the Synthesis of [18F]5-Fluorouracil from [18F]Fluoride for Human PET Imaging. Organometallics. 35(7). 1008–1014. 49 indexed citations
8.
Denmark, Scott E., Matthew T. Burk, & Andrew J. Hoover. (2010). On the Absolute Configurational Stability of Bromonium and Chloronium Ions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 132(4). 1232–1233. 165 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026