Andrew J. Chalk

593 citations
18 papers · 489 indexed · h-index 10

Andrew J. Chalk

15 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Andrew J. Chalk
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Accounting 144
  • Finance 93
  • Spectroscopy 130
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 37
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 38
Replace W. A. Thomas with:
W. A. Thomas United Kingdom
William J. Bernstein United States
Matthew J. Bloomfield United States
Matthias Hartmann Germany
Gaoquan Chen China
R. Ravichandran United States
H. K. van Dijk Netherlands
Sanjib Ray India
Felipe Aparicio Spain
Maria Nowak Poland
Andrew J. Chalk relative to W. A. Thomas United Kingdom W. A. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. A. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Chalk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Chalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Chalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Chalk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Chalk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Chalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Chalk. The network helps show where Andrew J. Chalk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Andrew J. Chalk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew J. Chalk Line = papers co-authored together Andrew J. Chalk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200433
2 200133
3 200128
4 20005
5 200024
6 20006
7 199929
8 199820
9 199793
10
MARKET FORCES AND AIRCRAFT SAFETY: THE CASE OF THE DC-10
19940
11 19891
12 19882
13 19874
14 19871
15 198747
16 1987122
17 198639
18
A NEW PROPOSAL FOR THE REFORM OF COMMERCIAL AIR CRASH LITIGATION
19852

About Andrew J. Chalk

Andrew J. Chalk is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Spectroscopy, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Accounting, having authored 18 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (3 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (144 citations), Finance (93 citations), Spectroscopy (130 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (37 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (38 citations). Andrew J. Chalk has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leo Radom, John W. Peavy, Bernd Beck, Timothy Clark, John P. Overington, Catherine L. Worth, A. W. Edith Chan, Simon Petrie, Michael A. Collins and P. Mayer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Economic Inquiry, Financial Analysts Journal and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026