Andrew I. Schwebel
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Demography top 1%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- John MorelandMark A. FineJames VessRobert D. WellsSteven BeckLinda James MyersEric H. KrautBeverly E. Thorn
- Topics
- Family Dynamics and Relationships (20 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (17 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Andrew I. Schwebel
72 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Clinical Psychology 570
- Sociology and Political Science 528
- Social Psychology 487
- Demography 310
- General Health Professions 153
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew I. Schwebel
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew I. Schwebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew I. Schwebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew I. Schwebel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew I. Schwebel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew I. Schwebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew I. Schwebel. The network helps show where Andrew I. Schwebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew I. Schwebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew I. Schwebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew I. Schwebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew I. Schwebel. Andrew I. Schwebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 138 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | Factors Associated with Relationship Stability in Geographically Separated Couples. | 15 |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Andrew I. Schwebel
Andrew I. Schwebel is a scholar working on Demography, Social Psychology and Research and Theory, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (20 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (17 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (570 citations), Demography (310 citations) and Social Psychology (487 citations). Andrew I. Schwebel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include John Moreland, Mark A. Fine, James Vess, Robert D. Wells, Steven Beck, Linda James Myers, Eric H. Kraut, Beverly E. Thorn, Fred Damarin and Robert W. Butler. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, American Journal of Public Health and Journal of Educational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.