Andrew Hinde

86 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Andrew Hinde's Hit Papers

THE BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERRITORIES OF BIRDS. 1956 · 401 citations
4010+23+46Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Andrew Hinde
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Gender Studies 343
  • Developmental Biology 45
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 356
  • Demography 211
  • General Health Professions 431
Replace Daniel Sellen with:
Daniel Sellen Canada
Susan Tanner United States
Howard Parker United Kingdom
Lee Cronk United States
Christoph Bühler Germany
Shiro Horiuchi Japan
Duncan Gillespie United Kingdom
Jan Beise Germany
Ryan Schacht United States
Heather Larkin United States
Andrew Hinde relative to Daniel Sellen Canada Daniel Sellen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Daniel Sellen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Hinde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Hinde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Hinde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Hinde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Hinde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Hinde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Hinde. The network helps show where Andrew Hinde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Hinde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Hinde Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Hinde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
THE BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERRITORIES OF BIRDS.
Hit paper breakdown →
1956401
2 2003175
3 200278
4 199350
5 201041
6 201337
7 200836
8 199236
9 201734
10 200033
11 200731
12 200830
13 201729
14 201627
15 200126
16 201925
17 198824
18 200124
19 198719
20 200018

About Andrew Hinde

Andrew Hinde is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (24 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (22 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (21 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (13 papers), Global Health Care Issues (10 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (343 citations), Developmental Biology (45 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (356 citations), Demography (211 citations) and General Health Professions (431 citations). Andrew Hinde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Priscilla A. Akwara, Nyovani Madise, Zoë Matthews, Paula Griffiths, Heather Joshi, Sabu S. Padmadas, Bernard Harris, Govinda P. Dahal, Akim J. Mturi and H. O. Lancaster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biosocial Science, Demographic Research, Social Science History, BMJ Open and The History of the Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact