Andrew H. Hansen

2.7k total citations
99 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Andrew H. Hansen is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew H. Hansen has authored 99 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 30 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 16 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Andrew H. Hansen's work include Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (68 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (52 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (30 papers). Andrew H. Hansen is often cited by papers focused on Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (68 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (52 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (30 papers). Andrew H. Hansen collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. Andrew H. Hansen's co-authors include Dudley S. Childress, Steven A. Gard, Steve C. Miff, Margrit R. Meier, Stefania Fatone, Charles C. Wang, Mark L. Edwards, Pinata H. Sessoms, Jason M. Wilken and Emily H. Sinitski and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Andrew H. Hansen

92 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew H. Hansen United States 26 1.8k 518 256 214 172 99 2.0k
Ava D. Segal United States 23 1.5k 0.9× 387 0.7× 523 2.0× 288 1.3× 200 1.2× 46 2.0k
Alena M. Grabowski United States 26 1.8k 1.0× 208 0.4× 285 1.1× 178 0.8× 165 1.0× 70 2.2k
Dudley S. Childress United States 27 2.0k 1.2× 437 0.8× 306 1.2× 218 1.0× 145 0.8× 81 2.4k
Steven A. Gard United States 26 1.6k 0.9× 350 0.7× 520 2.0× 456 2.1× 289 1.7× 79 2.2k
Stefania Fatone United States 24 1.1k 0.6× 414 0.8× 264 1.0× 444 2.1× 492 2.9× 92 1.8k
Karl E. Zelik United States 30 2.0k 1.1× 270 0.5× 364 1.4× 228 1.1× 332 1.9× 69 2.4k
Z. Sawacha Italy 22 806 0.5× 514 1.0× 495 1.9× 304 1.4× 269 1.6× 100 1.8k
David Boone United States 27 1.8k 1.0× 513 1.0× 266 1.0× 197 0.9× 625 3.6× 62 2.6k
Alberto Ferrari Italy 16 640 0.4× 204 0.4× 592 2.3× 303 1.4× 140 0.8× 47 1.4k
Juha M. Hijmans Netherlands 22 610 0.3× 487 0.9× 339 1.3× 232 1.1× 338 2.0× 85 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew H. Hansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew H. Hansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew H. Hansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew H. Hansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew H. Hansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew H. Hansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew H. Hansen. The network helps show where Andrew H. Hansen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew H. Hansen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew H. Hansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew H. Hansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew H. Hansen. Andrew H. Hansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cutti, Andrea Giovanni, et al.. (2024). Prosthetist-Specific Rectification Templates Based on Artificial Intelligence for the Digital Fabrication of Custom Transtibial Sockets. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(5). 1149–1169. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
4.
Rich, Tonya L., et al.. (2024). Examining patient reported outcome measures for phantom limb pain: measurement use in a sample of Veterans with amputation. Disability and Rehabilitation. 47(3). 687–695. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rich, Tonya L., et al.. (2023). Virtual Reality Game Selection for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Therapist's Wish List for Game Developers. Games for Health Journal. 12(6). 445–449. 3 indexed citations
6.
Halsne, Elizabeth G., Brian J. Hafner, Jane B. Shofer, et al.. (2023). The development of rating scales to evaluate experiential prosthetic foot preference for people with lower limb amputation. PM&R. 16(2). 150–159. 2 indexed citations
7.
Rich, Tonya L., et al.. (2022). Feasibility testing of a novel prosthetic socket sensor system. Disability and Rehabilitation. 45(14). 2374–2381. 3 indexed citations
8.
Gravely, Amy, et al.. (2021). Pilot Test of a Definitive Prosthetic Socket Made with 3D Printing Technology. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 35(1). 55–60. 3 indexed citations
9.
Hendershot, Brad D., et al.. (2019). Impact Testing of Prosthetic Feet for High-Activity Prosthesis Users: A Pilot Study. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 31(3). 207–212.
10.
Schnall, Barri L., et al.. (2019). A more compliant prosthetic foot better accommodates added load while walking among Servicemembers with transtibial limb loss. Journal of Biomechanics. 98. 109395–109395. 10 indexed citations
11.
Hansen, Andrew H., et al.. (2016). A drive system to add standing mobility to a manual standing wheelchair. Assistive Technology. 28(4). 218–224. 5 indexed citations
12.
Ferguson, John E., et al.. (2014). Pilot study of strap-based custom wheelchair seating system in persons with spinal cord injury. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 51(8). 1255–1264. 3 indexed citations
13.
Hansen, Andrew H., et al.. (2012). Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 49(2). 227–227. 65 indexed citations
14.
Hansen, Andrew H. & Charles C. Wang. (2010). Effective rocker shapes used by able-bodied persons for walking and fore-aft swaying: Implications for design of ankle–foot prostheses. Gait & Posture. 32(2). 181–184. 36 indexed citations
15.
Hansen, Andrew H. & Dudley S. Childress. (2010). Investigations of roll-over shape: implications for design, alignment, and evaluation of ankle-foot prostheses and orthoses. Disability and Rehabilitation. 32(26). 2201–2209. 42 indexed citations
16.
Fatone, Stefania, et al.. (2009). Effects of Clinically Prescribed Ankle Foot Orthoses on Ankle-Foot Roll-Over Shapes: A Case Series. JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 21(4). 196–203. 5 indexed citations
17.
Hansen, Andrew H., et al.. (2004). The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses. Journal of Biomechanics. 37(10). 1467–1474. 270 indexed citations
18.
Hansen, Andrew H., et al.. (2004). Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low-income countries. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 28(2). 132–140. 28 indexed citations
19.
Hansen, Andrew H. & Dudley S. Childress. (2002). Roll-over shapes of the human foot/ankle complex. 2. 828–830. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hansen, Andrew H. & Dudley S. Childress. (2000). Roll-over shapes of the human foot/ankle complex. 2. 828–830.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ava D. Segal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alena M. Grabowski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dudley S. Childress Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Steven A. Gard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stefania Fatone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karl E. Zelik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Z. Sawacha Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Boone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alberto Ferrari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Juha M. Hijmans
Rankless by CCL
2026