Andrew G. Reiter
-
- International Law and Human Rights 9
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 2
- International Law and Aviation 1
- Law top 2%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 4
- History top 5%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 4
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Conflict and Governance 5
- Human Rights and Development 3
- Development top 10%
-
- Credit Risk and Financial Regulations 2
- Co-authors
- Leigh A. PayneTricia D. OlsenTheodore ChaseThomas A. BicsakEric Wiebelhaus‐BrahmFrancesca LessaYongcan CaoWei Ren
- Journals
- Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (1 paper)Journal of Peace Research (1 paper)Law & Society Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Andrew G. Reiter
23 papers receiving 284 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Political Science and International Relations 166
- Law 54
- History 54
- Sociology and Political Science 203
- Development 13
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew G. Reiter
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew G. Reiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew G. Reiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew G. Reiter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew G. Reiter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew G. Reiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew G. Reiter. The network helps show where Andrew G. Reiter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Andrew G. Reiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 12 | Conclusion: amnesty in the age of accountability | 2012 | 3 |
| 13 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 15 | Taking Stock: Transitional Justice and Market Effects | 2010 | 1 |
| 16 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 79 | |
| 18 | Does Transitional Justice Work | 2008 | 3 |
| 19 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 64 |
About Andrew G. Reiter
Andrew G. Reiter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law and History, having authored 24 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (9 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Human Rights and Development (3 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers) and International Law and Aviation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (166 citations), Law (54 citations) and History (54 citations). Andrew G. Reiter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leigh A. Payne, Tricia D. Olsen, Theodore Chase, Thomas A. Bicsak, Eric Wiebelhaus‐Brahm, Francesca Lessa, Yongcan Cao and Wei Ren. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of Peace Research and Law & Society Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.