Andrew G. Harrell
- Surgery top 5%
- Hernia repair and management 7
- Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions 4
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 3
- Hematology top 5%
- Hemostasis and retained surgical items 2
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Pharmacy top 10%
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 2
-
- Abdominal Surgery and Complications 2
-
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 3
-
- Foreign Body Medical Cases 2
- Co-authors
- B. Todd HenifordKent W. KercherYuri W. NovitskyJoseph A. CristianoAmy E. LincourtH. James NortonB. Lauren PatonRichard D. Peindl
- Cited by
- SurgeryHematologyEmergency Medicine
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Andrew G. Harrell
20 papers receiving 840 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Surgery 768
- Hematology 193
- Emergency Medicine 68
- Pharmacy 32
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 189
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew G. Harrell
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew G. Harrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew G. Harrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew G. Harrell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew G. Harrell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew G. Harrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew G. Harrell. The network helps show where Andrew G. Harrell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew G. Harrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | How Can We Attract More Medical Students to General Surgery Residencies? A Study of Medical Student Evaluations of a General Surgery Clerkship for 10 Years: 2005-2015 | 2017 | 3 |
| 4 | Why Do Residents Quit General Surgery Residencies? A Study of 789 Graduates from 3 Campuses Who Matched into General Surgery over 40 Years: 1974 to 2015 | 2017 | 2 |
| 5 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 193 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 51 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 107 | |
| 10 | Meshes in hernia repair. | 2007 | 20 |
| 11 | 2006 | 68 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 70 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 55 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 139 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 52 |
About Andrew G. Harrell
Andrew G. Harrell is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Gender Studies and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hernia repair and management (7 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (3 papers), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Foreign Body Medical Cases (2 papers) and Abdominal Surgery and Complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (768 citations), Hematology (193 citations) and Emergency Medicine (68 citations). Andrew G. Harrell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include B. Todd Heniford, Kent W. Kercher, Yuri W. Novitsky, Joseph A. Cristiano, Amy E. Lincourt, H. James Norton, B. Lauren Paton, Richard D. Peindl, B. Todd Heniford and Timothy S. Kuwada. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, Surgery and Surgical Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.