Andrew E. Marble

675 citations
25 papers · 520 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew E. Marble

24 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

Andrew E. Marble
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 342
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 277
  • Spectroscopy 193
  • Radiation 22
  • Geophysics 33
Replace David Sedarsky with:
David Sedarsky Sweden
P. Pignolet France
Julien Loiseau France
Megan Paciaroni United States
Melvin N. Miller Brazil
Shinriki Teii Japan
M. Nansteel United States
James Tickner Australia
S. Buontempo Italy
Dean D. Verhoeven France
Andrew E. Marble relative to David Sedarsky Sweden David Sedarsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
David Sedarsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Marble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Marble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Marble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Marble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Marble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Marble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Marble. The network helps show where Andrew E. Marble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Marble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew E. Marble Line = papers co-authored together Andrew E. Marble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200584
2 200776
3 200549
4 200646
5 200938
6 200836
7 200524
8 200823
9 200820
10 200717
11 200717
12 202314
13 200412
14 200912
15 201111
16 200811
17 20066
18 20116
19 20045
20 20124

About Andrew E. Marble

Andrew E. Marble is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include NMR spectroscopy and applications (15 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (2 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (2 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (342 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (277 citations), Spectroscopy (193 citations), Radiation (22 citations) and Geophysics (33 citations). Andrew E. Marble has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Bruce J. Balcom, Bruce G. Colpitts, Igor V. Mastikhin, Quan Chen, Gabriel LaPlante, Julian Meng, Ahmad Mohamad Mezher, Bryce MacMillan, Benedict Newling and Laura Romero‐Zerón. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetic Resonance, NDT & E International, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture and Canadian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact