Andrew E. Epstein
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Vance J. PlumbRichard N. FogorosMark D. CarlsonSteven L. HigginsFerdinand J. VendittiG. Neal KayJames H. BakerJames K. Kirklin
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (7 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of CardiologyThe American Journal of CardiologyHeart Rhythm
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew E. Epstein
12 papers receiving 436 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 420
- Surgery 49
- Molecular Biology 25
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 21
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 18
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Epstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Epstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Epstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Epstein. The network helps show where Andrew E. Epstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew E. Epstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew E. Epstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew E. Epstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew E. Epstein. Andrew E. Epstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 102 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 50 |
About Andrew E. Epstein
Andrew E. Epstein is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Genetics and Hematology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (7 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (420 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (5 citations) and Emergency Medicine (15 citations). Andrew E. Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vance J. Plumb, Richard N. Fogoros, Mark D. Carlson, Steven L. Higgins, Ferdinand J. Venditti, G. Neal Kay, James H. Baker, G. Neal Kay, James K. Kirklin and Sharon M. Dailey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.