Andrew Crichton

1.2k total citations
38 papers, 643 citations indexed

About

Andrew Crichton is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Crichton has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 643 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Ophthalmology, 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Andrew Crichton's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers). Andrew Crichton is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers). Andrew Crichton collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Denmark. Andrew Crichton's co-authors include John A. McWhae, Stephen M. Drance, Gordon R. Douglas, Michael Schulzer, Richard P. Mills, Andrew Kirker, Stephen M. Drance, Karim F. Damji, Amin Kherani and Geoff Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Crichton

38 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Crichton Canada 12 590 315 139 125 47 38 643
Y. Lachkar France 14 839 1.4× 570 1.8× 136 1.0× 214 1.7× 41 0.9× 52 912
Kevin Kaplowitz United States 14 565 1.0× 385 1.2× 130 0.9× 72 0.6× 26 0.6× 34 644
Paolo Bettin Italy 12 694 1.2× 496 1.6× 112 0.8× 46 0.4× 46 1.0× 26 740
H. Caroline Geijssen Netherlands 11 574 1.0× 319 1.0× 107 0.8× 96 0.8× 51 1.1× 12 601
Courtland M. Schmidt United States 19 857 1.5× 574 1.8× 144 1.0× 69 0.6× 45 1.0× 30 930
Ruth D. Williams United States 4 778 1.3× 538 1.7× 72 0.5× 124 1.0× 48 1.0× 6 826
Anand V. Mantravadi United States 11 655 1.1× 408 1.3× 64 0.5× 81 0.6× 64 1.4× 20 707
Laura Dallorto Italy 10 499 0.8× 360 1.1× 76 0.5× 62 0.5× 43 0.9× 16 539
David B. Yan Canada 9 405 0.7× 264 0.8× 74 0.5× 60 0.5× 64 1.4× 18 448
Christian P. Jonescu-Cuypers Germany 15 573 1.0× 440 1.4× 55 0.4× 88 0.7× 44 0.9× 34 646

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Crichton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Crichton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Crichton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Crichton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Crichton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Crichton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Crichton. The network helps show where Andrew Crichton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Crichton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Crichton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Crichton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Crichton. Andrew Crichton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crichton, Andrew, et al.. (2022). Stabilization of refractive error and associated factors following small incision phacoemulsification cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmology. 22(1). 13–13. 9 indexed citations
2.
Kherani, Amin, et al.. (2022). Cytomegalovirus as a cause of recurrent corneal endotheliitis in the Canadian population. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 58(5). 417–421. 1 indexed citations
3.
Crichton, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Are Topical Steroids a Risk Factor for Tube Exposure in Glaucoma Drainage Devices?. Clinical ophthalmology. Volume 15. 1759–1761. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rokne, Jon, et al.. (2021). Utilizing a responsive web portal for studying disc tracing agreement in retinal images. PLoS ONE. 16(5). e0251703–e0251703. 2 indexed citations
5.
Crichton, Andrew, et al.. (2020). Structural polymorphisms in fibrillar aggregates associated with exfoliation syndrome. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 15860–15860. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hodge, William, Cindy Hutnik, Andrew Crichton, et al.. (2018). A Randomized Clinical Trial of SLT vs ALT in Patients Who Have Already Received 360 Degrees of SLT-The Canadian Laser Study Trial Network.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 3461–3461. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hutnik, Cindy, Andrew Crichton, Marcelo T. Nicolela, et al.. (2018). Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Glaucoma Patients Treated Previously with 360° Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmology. 126(2). 223–232. 28 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Roger E., Andrew Crichton, & Bennett C. Thomas. (2014). Antimetabolites in cataract surgery to prevent failure of a previous trabeculectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014(7). CD010627–CD010627. 5 indexed citations
9.
Hutnik, Cindy, Catherine M. Birt, Karim F. Damji, et al.. (2012). A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Secondary to Pseudoexfoliation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 6351–6351. 1 indexed citations
10.
Crichton, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Morning Dosing of Once-daily Glaucoma Medication is More Convenient and May Lead to Greater Adherence Than Evening Dosing. Journal of Glaucoma. 22(1). 1–4. 11 indexed citations
11.
Crichton, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Effectiveness of Dorzolamide–Timolol (COSOPT) in Patients Who Were Treatment Naive for Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The COSOPT First-Line Study. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 26(5). 503–511. 11 indexed citations
12.
Ells, Anna L., et al.. (2007). Safety Profile of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 23(3). 304–310. 38 indexed citations
13.
Thygesen, John, Reinhard O. W. Burk, Roberto Carassa, et al.. (2007). Criteria for choosing clinically effective glaucoma treatment: A discussion panel consensus. Current Therapeutic Research. 68(3). 127–136. 8 indexed citations
14.
McWhae, John A., et al.. (2003). Ultrasound biomicroscopy for the assessment of zonules after ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 110(7). 1340–1343. 52 indexed citations
16.
Drance, Stephen M., Andrew Crichton, & Richard P. Mills. (1998). Comparison of the Effect of Latanoprost 0.005% and Timolol 0.5% on the Calculated Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Patients With Normal-tension Glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 125(5). 585–592. 54 indexed citations
18.
McWhae, John A. & Andrew Crichton. (1996). The use of ultrasound biomicroscopy following trabeculectomy.. PubMed. 31(4). 187–91. 36 indexed citations
19.
Gimbel, Howard V., et al.. (1996). The role of small-incision cataract surgery in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 7(2). 2–10. 5 indexed citations
20.
Crichton, Andrew. (1981). Evaluation as a process for increasing awareness and developing new approaches to problem solving.. PubMed. 2(1). 42–57. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026