Andrew Crichton

38 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers

Andrew Crichton
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Ophthalmology 590
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 315
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 139
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 125
  • Molecular Biology 47
Replace Ruth D. Williams with:
Ruth D. Williams United States
Y. Lachkar France
Feray Koç Türkiye
H. Caroline Geijssen Netherlands
Alexander H. Rulo Netherlands
Anand V. Mantravadi United States
Robert M. Schertzer United States
Courtland M. Schmidt United States
Nobuyuki Koseki Japan
David B. Yan Canada
Andrew Crichton relative to Ruth D. Williams United States Ruth D. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ruth D. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Crichton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Crichton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Crichton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Crichton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Crichton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Crichton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Crichton. The network helps show where Andrew Crichton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Crichton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Crichton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Crichton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Crichton. Andrew Crichton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 9
2 1
3 1
4 2
5 3
6
A Randomized Clinical Trial of SLT vs ALT in Patients Who Have Already Received 360 Degrees of SLT-The Canadian Laser Study Trial Network.
1
7 28
8 44
9
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty versus Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Secondary to Pseudoexfoliation
1
10 11
11 11
12 38
13 8
14 52
15 35
16 54
17 34
18 5
19 135
20
Fish hook removal from vitreous and retina. Case report.
10

About Andrew Crichton

Andrew Crichton is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (27 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (590 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (315 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (139 citations). Andrew Crichton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include John A. McWhae, Stephen M. Drance, Michael Schulzer, Gordon R. Douglas, Andrew Kirker, Stephen M. Drance, Richard P. Mills, Karim F. Damji, Catherine M. Birt and Amin Kherani. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026