Andrew Cosham

952 total citations
34 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

Andrew Cosham is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Cosham has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 15 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 11 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Andrew Cosham's work include Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (29 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (15 papers) and Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (10 papers). Andrew Cosham is often cited by papers focused on Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (29 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (15 papers) and Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (10 papers). Andrew Cosham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Andrew Cosham's co-authors include Phil Hopkins, Kenneth A. Macdonald, David Jones, Keith Armstrong, Chris Alexander, Edward B. Clark, Andrew Palmer, Stijn Hertelé, Robert M. Andrews and Brian N. Leis and has published in prestigious journals such as Engineering Structures, Engineering Failure Analysis and International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Cosham

31 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Cosham United Kingdom 12 564 313 245 240 155 34 696
Phil Hopkins United Kingdom 10 518 0.9× 317 1.0× 224 0.9× 189 0.8× 158 1.0× 40 647
François Ayello United States 14 174 0.3× 295 0.9× 175 0.7× 52 0.2× 149 1.0× 42 515
M. Fitzka Austria 16 442 0.8× 139 0.4× 63 0.3× 429 1.8× 87 0.6× 39 654
Robert M. Andrews United Kingdom 7 330 0.6× 127 0.4× 91 0.4× 376 1.6× 151 1.0× 19 512
Ahmed M. Mohammed United Kingdom 10 152 0.3× 78 0.2× 26 0.1× 210 0.9× 240 1.5× 33 516
Bianca Pinheiro Brazil 11 307 0.5× 148 0.5× 107 0.4× 209 0.9× 137 0.9× 27 449
Victor Igwemezie United Kingdom 8 216 0.4× 66 0.2× 69 0.3× 185 0.8× 83 0.5× 14 367
Muntazir Abbas United Kingdom 7 178 0.3× 90 0.3× 41 0.2× 139 0.6× 135 0.9× 14 350
Shokrollah Hassani United States 8 181 0.3× 294 0.9× 181 0.7× 23 0.1× 240 1.5× 14 762
Fuhui Shen Germany 15 525 0.9× 342 1.1× 44 0.2× 440 1.8× 17 0.1× 46 660

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Cosham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Cosham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Cosham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Cosham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Cosham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Cosham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Cosham. The network helps show where Andrew Cosham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Cosham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Cosham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Cosham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Cosham. Andrew Cosham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Full-Scale Burst Tests With Hydrogen.
2.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Hydrogen: Live Transmission.
3.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2022). The Decompressed Stress Level in Dense Phase Carbon Dioxide Full-Scale Fracture Propagation Tests. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 4 indexed citations
4.
Cosham, Andrew & Robert M. Andrews. (2018). The assessment of locally thinned areas: Background to the guidance given in Annex G of BS 7910:2013. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 169. 177–187. 3 indexed citations
5.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2017). ECAs: Lifting the Lid of the Black Box. 1 indexed citations
6.
7.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2012). The Decompression Behaviour of Carbon Dioxide in the Dense Phase. 447–464. 40 indexed citations
8.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2008). Fracture Control in Carbon Dioxide Pipelines: The Effect of Impurities. 229–240. 16 indexed citations
9.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (2008). ECAs: Are they fit-for-purpose?. 1 indexed citations
10.
Cosham, Andrew & Kenneth A. Macdonald. (2008). Fracture Control in Pipelines Under High Plastic Strains: A Critique of DNV-RP-F108. 625–638. 6 indexed citations
11.
Cosham, Andrew, Phil Hopkins, & Kenneth A. Macdonald. (2007). Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines – Corrosion. Engineering Failure Analysis. 14(7). 1245–1265. 141 indexed citations
12.
Macdonald, Kenneth A., Andrew Cosham, Chris Alexander, & Phil Hopkins. (2006). Assessing mechanical damage in offshore pipelines – Two case studies. Engineering Failure Analysis. 14(8). 1667–1679. 47 indexed citations
13.
Cosham, Andrew, Phil Hopkins, & Andrew Palmer. (2004). An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effect of Pre-Strain on the Fracture Toughness of Line Pipe Steel. 2004 International Pipeline Conference, Volumes 1, 2, and 3. 1635–1652. 5 indexed citations
14.
Cosham, Andrew & Phil Hopkins. (2004). An Overview of the Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cosham, Andrew & Phil Hopkins. (2003). The effect of dents in pipelines—guidance in the pipeline defect assessment manual. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 81(2). 127–139. 147 indexed citations
16.
Hopkins, Phil & Andrew Cosham. (2003). The Assessment Of Corrosion In Pipelines: Guidance In The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual (PDAM). 25 indexed citations
17.
Cosham, Andrew & Phil Hopkins. (2002). The Pipeline Defect Assessment Manual. 1565–1581. 60 indexed citations
18.
Cosham, Andrew. (2001). A Model of Pre-Strain Effects on Fracture Toughness. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 123(4). 182–190. 18 indexed citations
19.
Hopkins, Phil & Andrew Cosham. (1998). How do you manage your pipeline. 43(1). 19–25. 3 indexed citations
20.
Cosham, Andrew, et al.. (1998). Can Limit States Design be Used to Design a Pipeline Above 80% SMYS?. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Phil Hopkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by François Ayello Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Fitzka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert M. Andrews Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ahmed M. Mohammed Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bianca Pinheiro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Victor Igwemezie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Muntazir Abbas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shokrollah Hassani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fuhui Shen
Rankless by CCL
2026