Andrew Carverhill
- Finance top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ronald W. AndersonK. D. ElworthyStewart D. HodgesLes ClewlowRoss H. McLeodSiwage Dharma NegaraThee Kian WieDirk Tomsa
- Topics
- Stochastic processes and financial applications (17 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (11 papers)Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers)
- Journals
- Review of Financial StudiesThe Economic JournalTransactions of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Andrew Carverhill
29 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Finance 285
- Economics and Econometrics 108
- Mathematical Physics 96
- Accounting 77
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Carverhill
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Carverhill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Carverhill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Carverhill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Carverhill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Carverhill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Carverhill. The network helps show where Andrew Carverhill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Carverhill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Carverhill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Carverhill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Carverhill. Andrew Carverhill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 72 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies | 52 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 69 |
About Andrew Carverhill
Andrew Carverhill is a scholar working on Finance, Mathematical Physics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 34 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (17 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (11 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (285 citations), Mathematical Physics (96 citations) and Accounting (77 citations). Andrew Carverhill has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Ronald W. Anderson, K. D. Elworthy, Stewart D. Hodges, Les Clewlow, Ross H. McLeod, Siwage Dharma Negara, Thee Kian Wie, Dirk Tomsa, Budi Setiyono and Dan Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Financial Studies, The Economic Journal and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.