Andrew Bragdon

1.5k citations
26 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Bragdon

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Andrew Bragdon
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Human-Computer Interaction 360
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 425
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 383
  • Software 60
  • Computer Science Applications 65
Replace Thomas Green with:
Thomas Green United States
Pradeep Shenoy United States
Edwin J. Morris United States
Kathleen Carter United States
Lee W. Campbell United States
Jessica D. Bayliss United States
Santosh Mathan United States
Kambiz Badie Iran
Xiangzhen Kong China
Brian Roark United States
Andrew Bragdon relative to Thomas Green United States Thomas Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Thomas Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Bragdon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Bragdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Bragdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Bragdon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Bragdon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Bragdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Bragdon. The network helps show where Andrew Bragdon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Bragdon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Bragdon Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Bragdon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20113
2 20118
3 2010118
4 201091
5 201018
6 20105
7 200946
8 20085
9 20087
10 200831
11 20086
12 200611
13 199256
14 19913
15 199161
16 199019
17 198995
18 198814
19 1986101
20 198647

About Andrew Bragdon

Andrew Bragdon is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers) and Software Engineering Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (360 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (425 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (383 citations), Software (60 citations) and Computer Science Applications (65 citations). Andrew Bragdon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Wilkie A. Wilson, Robert C. Zeleznik, Ken Hinckley, Steven F. Stasheff, Joseph J. LaViola, Donald M. Taylor, W. A. Wilson, Peter H. King, David D. Mott and Darrell V. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Neurology, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications and Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026