Andrew Allison

886 total citations
16 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Andrew Allison is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Allison has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Oncology, 12 papers in Surgery and 12 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Andrew Allison's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (12 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (9 papers). Andrew Allison is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (12 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (9 papers). Andrew Allison collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Andrew Allison's co-authors include Nader Francis, Jonathan Ockrim, Neil Smart, Paul White, Emad Salib, Robin H. Kennedy, I. Wrench, Stephen Radley, Matthew Wilson and Andrea Galimberti and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Human Pathology and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Allison

16 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Allison United Kingdom 12 369 247 243 54 42 16 486
R. Sripadam United Kingdom 8 331 0.9× 354 1.4× 142 0.6× 168 3.1× 145 3.5× 16 673
Faysal Şaylık Türkiye 13 101 0.3× 101 0.4× 273 1.1× 47 0.9× 26 0.6× 54 474
Jonathan Ockrim United Kingdom 11 284 0.8× 201 0.8× 173 0.7× 75 1.4× 39 0.9× 14 385
Justin K. Lawrence United States 8 337 0.9× 222 0.9× 142 0.6× 63 1.2× 37 0.9× 12 408
G. Godiris-Petit France 12 475 1.3× 45 0.2× 70 0.3× 82 1.5× 57 1.4× 31 593
İbrahim Etem Çelik Türkiye 13 168 0.5× 134 0.5× 332 1.4× 56 1.0× 17 0.4× 29 508
Barrie Keeler United Kingdom 11 148 0.4× 94 0.4× 64 0.3× 40 0.7× 19 0.5× 37 404
Grace S. Hwang United States 11 376 1.0× 239 1.0× 174 0.7× 99 1.8× 40 1.0× 19 465
Jacopo Crippa Italy 17 553 1.5× 554 2.2× 177 0.7× 246 4.6× 25 0.6× 56 754
Pritesh Mehta United States 9 256 0.7× 73 0.3× 74 0.3× 80 1.5× 18 0.4× 18 509

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Allison. The network helps show where Andrew Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Allison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Allison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Allison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Allison. Andrew Allison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Curtis, Nathan, Emma L. Court, C. Spencer, et al.. (2020). Impact of anaemia at discharge following colorectal cancer surgery. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 35(9). 1769–1776. 11 indexed citations
2.
Curtis, Nathan, Jessica Conti, Richard Dalton, et al.. (2019). 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy. 33(10). 3370–3383. 24 indexed citations
3.
Curtis, Nathan, Godwin Dennison, Jonathan Ockrim, et al.. (2019). Factors Predicting Operative Difficulty of Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 62(12). 1467–1476. 7 indexed citations
4.
Curtis, Nathan, Malcolm West, Emad Salib, et al.. (2018). Time from colorectal cancer diagnosis to laparoscopic curative surgery—is there a safe window for prehabilitation?. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 33(7). 979–983. 30 indexed citations
5.
Francis, Nader, Nathan Curtis, Emma Noble, et al.. (2018). Does the number of operating specialists influence the conversion rate and outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery?. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(8). 3652–3658. 8 indexed citations
6.
Curtis, Nathan, Morgan Taylor, Laura Fraser, et al.. (2017). Can the combination of laparoscopy and enhanced recovery improve long-term survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery?. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 33(2). 231–234. 18 indexed citations
7.
Curtis, Nathan, Emma Noble, Emad Salib, et al.. (2017). Does hospital readmission following colorectal cancer resection and enhanced recovery after surgery affect long term survival?. Colorectal Disease. 19(8). 723–730. 10 indexed citations
8.
Foster, Jake, Danilo Mišković, Andrew Allison, et al.. (2016). Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Techniques in Coloproctology. 20(6). 361–367. 44 indexed citations
9.
Francis, Nader, Emad Salib, David Messenger, et al.. (2015). The use of artificial neural networks to predict delayed discharge and readmission in enhanced recovery following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Techniques in Coloproctology. 19(7). 419–428. 30 indexed citations
10.
Wrench, I., Andrew Allison, Andrea Galimberti, Stephen Radley, & Matthew Wilson. (2015). Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 24(2). 124–130. 67 indexed citations
11.
Francis, Nader, Emad Salib, David Messenger, et al.. (2015). Factors predicting 30‐day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Disease. 17(7). O148–54. 40 indexed citations
12.
Harrison, Oliver J., Neil Smart, Paul White, et al.. (2014). Operative Time and Outcome of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 18(2). 265–272. 40 indexed citations
13.
Smart, Neil, Paul White, Andrew Allison, et al.. (2012). Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following laparoscopic surgery: An early prediction model. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol). 1 indexed citations
14.
Smart, Neil, Paul White, Andrew Allison, et al.. (2012). Deviation and failure of enhanced recovery after surgery following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: early prediction model. Colorectal Disease. 14(10). e727–34. 88 indexed citations
15.
Allison, Andrew, et al.. (2010). The Angiographic Anatomy of the Small Arteries and Their Collaterals in Colorectal Resections. Annals of Surgery. 251(6). 1092–1097. 46 indexed citations
16.
Allison, Andrew, et al.. (2007). The insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor and colorectal neoplasia: insights into invasion. Human Pathology. 38(11). 1590–1602. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026