Andreas Thums

423 citations
16 papers · 330 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Thums

15 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Andreas Thums
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
  • Software 32
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 67
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 24
  • Artificial Intelligence 80
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 15
Replace Ian Toyn with:
Ian Toyn United Kingdom
Linas Laibinis Finland
Muddassar Azam Sindhu Pakistan
William Heaven United Kingdom
Vinayak S. Prabhu United States
Robert J. Stroud United Kingdom
Donald I. Good United States
Shantanu Thakoor United States
Alexey Vladimirovich Khoroshilov Russia
Martyn Thomas United Kingdom
Andreas Thums relative to Ian Toyn United Kingdom Ian Toyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Ian Toyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Thums

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Thums's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Thums with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Thums more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Thums

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Thums. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Thums. The network helps show where Andreas Thums may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Thums, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Thums Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Thums links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2000101
2
Formal Fault Tree Semantics
200238
3 200437
4 200423
5 200423
6 200318
7 200115
8 200013
9 200913
10 201213
11 200312
12 201211
13 20027
14
Automotive Software: Characteristics and Reengineering Challenges.
20094
15 20082
16
Parsing Variant C Code: An Evaluation on Automotive Software.
20140

About Andreas Thums

Andreas Thums is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (5 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (32 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (67 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (24 citations), Artificial Intelligence (80 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (15 citations). Andreas Thums has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Schellhorn, Wolfgang Reif, Michael Balser, Frank Ortmeier, Alexander Knapp and Klaus Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Lecture notes in computer science, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, OPUS (Augsburg University) and Proceedings/Proceedings - Conference on Software Maintenance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact