Andreas Thums
Impact in
- Software top 10%
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
-
- Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Real-Time Systems Scheduling 4
- Embedded Systems Design Techniques 2
- Software 4
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 2
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research 2
- Co-authors
- Gerhard Schellhorn (3 shared papers)Wolfgang Reif (2 shared papers)Christian Tischer (1 shared paper)Andreas Müller (1 shared paper)Klaus Schmid (1 shared paper)Frank Ortmeier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety (1 paper)Softwaretechnik-Trends (2 papers)OPUS (Augsburg University) (1 paper)IFAC Proceedings Volumes (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andreas Thums
6 papers receiving 65 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Software 50
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 16
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 12
- Hardware and Architecture 11
- Information Systems 27
Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Thums
This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Thums's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Thums with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Thums more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Thums
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Thums. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Thums. The network helps show where Andreas Thums may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Thums, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Formal Fault Tree Semantics | 2002 | 27 |
| 2 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 6 | Automotive Software: Characteristics and Reengineering Challenges. | 2009 | 5 |
| 7 | Parsing Variant C Code: An Evaluation on Automotive Software. | 2014 | 0 |
| 8 | 2000 | 0 |
About Andreas Thums
Andreas Thums is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Software, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Real-Time Systems Scheduling (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (2 papers), Real-time simulation and control systems (2 papers) and Aerospace, Electronics, Mathematical Modeling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (50 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (16 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (12 citations), Hardware and Architecture (11 citations) and Information Systems (27 citations). Andreas Thums has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Schellhorn, Wolfgang Reif, Christian Tischer, Andreas Müller, Klaus Schmid and Frank Ortmeier. Their work appears in journals such as Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Softwaretechnik-Trends, OPUS (Augsburg University) and IFAC Proceedings Volumes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.