Andrea Willhite

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 994 citations indexed

About

Andrea Willhite is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrea Willhite has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 994 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Andrea Willhite's work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers). Andrea Willhite is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (2 papers). Andrea Willhite collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Russia. Andrea Willhite's co-authors include Susan J. Harkema, Claudia Angeli, Enrico Rejc, Yangsheng Chen, Christie K. Ferreira, Joel W. Burdick, Yury Gerasimenko, Robert G. Grossman, V. Reggie Edgerton and Jonathan E. Hodes and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Andrea Willhite

7 papers receiving 977 citations

Hit Papers

Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal ... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrea Willhite United States 6 748 359 230 220 202 7 994
Sharon Zdunowski United States 13 739 1.0× 362 1.0× 252 1.1× 196 0.9× 214 1.1× 17 928
Jonathan S. Calvert United States 17 815 1.1× 433 1.2× 272 1.2× 265 1.2× 256 1.3× 22 1.1k
Т. Р. Мошонкина Russia 14 651 0.9× 262 0.7× 325 1.4× 224 1.0× 218 1.1× 79 864
Yuri P. Gerasimenko Russia 6 593 0.8× 234 0.7× 274 1.2× 365 1.7× 180 0.9× 7 987
Yu. P. Gerasimenko Russia 11 520 0.7× 180 0.5× 232 1.0× 204 0.9× 122 0.6× 66 698
Meegan G. Van Straaten United States 12 658 0.9× 387 1.1× 169 0.7× 209 0.9× 233 1.2× 20 901
Megan L. Gill United States 8 599 0.8× 322 0.9× 184 0.8× 179 0.8× 188 0.9× 16 736
Christie K. Ferreira United States 8 1.1k 1.5× 525 1.5× 400 1.7× 437 2.0× 374 1.9× 8 1.5k
Heinrich Binder Austria 13 506 0.7× 271 0.8× 306 1.3× 172 0.8× 169 0.8× 18 802
Dina I. Drubach United States 4 473 0.6× 245 0.7× 153 0.7× 155 0.7× 140 0.7× 5 598

Countries citing papers authored by Andrea Willhite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea Willhite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea Willhite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea Willhite more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea Willhite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea Willhite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea Willhite. The network helps show where Andrea Willhite may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea Willhite

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea Willhite. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea Willhite based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea Willhite. Andrea Willhite is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Rejc, Enrico, Nicola Giovanelli, Simone Porcelli, et al.. (2021). Effects of NMES pulse width and intensity on muscle mechanical output and oxygen extraction in able-bodied and paraplegic individuals. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 121(6). 1653–1664. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hubscher, Charles H., et al.. (2020). Effect of Different Forms of Activity-Based Recovery Training on Bladder, Bowel, and Sexual Function After Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 102(5). 865–873. 14 indexed citations
3.
Harkema, Susan J., et al.. (2020). Epidural stimulation for cardiovascular function increases lower limb lean mass in individuals with chronic motor complete spinal cord injury. Experimental Physiology. 105(10). 1684–1691. 11 indexed citations
4.
Shalaby, Ahmed, Ahmed Soliman, Andrea Willhite, et al.. (2019). Novel stochastic framework for automatic segmentation of human thigh MRI volumes and its applications in spinal cord injured individuals. PLoS ONE. 14(5). e0216487–e0216487. 18 indexed citations
5.
Hubscher, Charles H., et al.. (2018). Improvements in bladder, bowel and sexual outcomes following task-specific locomotor training in human spinal cord injury. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0190998–e0190998. 99 indexed citations
6.
Ward, Patricia J., April N. Herrity, Rebecca Smith, et al.. (2013). Novel Multi-System Functional Gains via Task Specific Training in Spinal Cord Injured Male Rats. Journal of Neurotrauma. 31(9). 819–833. 51 indexed citations
7.
Harkema, Susan J., Yury Gerasimenko, Jonathan E. Hodes, et al.. (2011). Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. The Lancet. 377(9781). 1938–1947. 798 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026