Andrea Poma

507 citations
11 papers · 66 indexed · h-index 4
Topics
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (5 papers)Educational and Social Studies (2 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers)
Journals
Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin)Cambridge University Press eBooksDIAL (Catholic University of Leuven)
Partner nations
ItalyRussiaUnited States

In The Last Decade

Andrea Poma

7 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers

Andrea Poma
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Philosophy 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 15
  • Literature and Literary Theory 10
  • Political Science and International Relations 8
Replace John P. Doyle with:
John P. Doyle Latvia
Peter France United Kingdom
Richard Waswo Switzerland
Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert Germany
Nicholas Halmi United Kingdom
Stephen B. Dobranski United States
Boethius
Roger A. Hornsby
John Duns Scotus
Daniel Boëthius
Andrea Poma relative to John P. Doyle Latvia John P. Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
John P. Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrea Poma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea Poma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea Poma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea Poma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea Poma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea Poma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea Poma. The network helps show where Andrea Poma may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea Poma

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea Poma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea Poma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea Poma. Andrea Poma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 0
4 3
5 2
6 1
7 11
8 5
9 0
10
The critical philosophy of Hermann Cohen : La filosofia critica di Hermann Cohen
2
11 40

About Andrea Poma

Andrea Poma is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 66 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (5 papers), Educational and Social Studies (2 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (43 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (15 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (5 citations). Andrea Poma has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Morgan, Allan Arkush, Kenneth Seeskin, Peter E. Gordon, Lawrence Kaplan, Steven B. Smith, Berel Lang, Richard A. Cohen, Leora Batnitzky and T. M. Rudavsky. Their work appears in journals such as Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin), Cambridge University Press eBooks and DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026