This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea Lucchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea Lucchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea Lucchi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea Lucchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea Lucchi. The network helps show where Andrea Lucchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea Lucchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea Lucchi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea Lucchi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea Lucchi. Andrea Lucchi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Martinez‐Sañudo, Isabel, et al.. (2011). Pyralidae Phycitinae in Italian vineyards: behavioural and molecular genetic investigations. 85. 211–215.2 indexed citations
8.
Ladurner, E., et al.. (2009). Naturalis (Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC 74040) - a sustainable and effective tool for the control of wireworms on potato.. 77–80.1 indexed citations
9.
Tasin, Marco, et al.. (2008). Grape volatiles drive the oviposition of the vine moth females at a close range. 36. 351–353.1 indexed citations
10.
Tasin, Marco, Gianfranco Anfora, Anna‐Carin Bäckman, et al.. (2008). Volatiles from grape drive the oviposition of Lobesia botrana at short distance. CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Fondazione Edmund Mach). 36. 351–353.2 indexed citations
11.
Cristofaro, Antonio De, Gianfranco Anfora, Marco Tasin, et al.. (2008). Olfactory cells responding to the main pheromone component and plant volatiles in Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.): possible effects on monitoring systems.. 36. 245–249.3 indexed citations
12.
Bagnoli, B. & Andrea Lucchi. (2006). Parasitoids of Lobesia botrana (Den. & Schiff.) in Tuscany. 29(11). 139–142.13 indexed citations
13.
Mazzoni, M.P., et al.. (2005). Le cicaline del vigneto in Umbria. 18. 73–78.2 indexed citations
14.
Bagnoli, B. & Andrea Lucchi. (2003). European Grapevine Moth Control in a Chianti vineyard by mating disruption technique. 26. 121–125.3 indexed citations
15.
Lucchi, Andrea, et al.. (2001). Occurrence of leafhoppers (Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) in three vineyards of the Pisa Province. 24. 267–272.1 indexed citations
16.
Rossi, Elena, et al.. (2000). Urban IPM and G.I.S. (Geographical Information System): a promising meeting.. Informatore fitopatologico. 50(12). 26–32.1 indexed citations
17.
Rossi, Elisabetta, et al.. (2000). Difesa Integrata del Verde Urbano e G.I.S.: un promettente incontro. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 12. 26–32.1 indexed citations
18.
Materazzi, Alberto, et al.. (1998). No evidence for the transmission of three grapevine viruses by Metcalfa pruinosa (Say). Journal of Plant Pathology. 80. 175–175.2 indexed citations
19.
Lucchi, Andrea. (1997). Metcalfa pruinosa and honey production in Italy.. American bee journal. 7. 532–535.5 indexed citations
20.
Lucchi, Andrea. (1993). The scent gland system of Nezara viridula (L.) (Rhyncota, Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). II. Nymphal abdominal glands. CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa). 76(1). 129–145.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.