Andrea de Winter
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Co-authors
- Louise MeijeringLucia Di FuriaWilma VolleberghAnnerieke OosterwegelMaja DekovićPeter PelsFrank C. VerhulstRené Veenstra
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers)
- Journals
- PEDIATRICSInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthBMC Public Health
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Andrea de Winter
11 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- General Health Professions 125
- Clinical Psychology 118
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 56
- Sociology and Political Science 54
- Education 37
Countries citing papers authored by Andrea de Winter
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrea de Winter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrea de Winter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrea de Winter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrea de Winter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrea de Winter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrea de Winter. The network helps show where Andrea de Winter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrea de Winter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrea de Winter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrea de Winter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrea de Winter. Andrea de Winter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Co-creation of an online portal for dialysis patients with low eHealth literacy : effect on adoption | 0 |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 78 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | Recovery in der Praxis: Voraussetzungen, Interventionen, Projekte | 6 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 98 | |
| 12 | [Intrauterine growth in full-term twins without risk factors]. | 5 |
| 13 | [Intrauterine growth in Chilean middle class newborn infants]. | 23 |
About Andrea de Winter
Andrea de Winter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (118 citations), General Health Professions (125 citations) and Health (25 citations). Andrea de Winter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Louise Meijering, Lucia Di Furia, Wilma Vollebergh, Annerieke Oosterwegel, Maja Deković, Peter Pels, Frank C. Verhulst, René Veenstra, Margreet ten Have and Inge Hutter. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.