Anatole Nöstl
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Marketing top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Plant Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Patrik SörqvistJohn E. MarshAndreas HagaLinda LangeborgMattias HolmgrenNiklas HalinAnders KjellbergStaffan Hygge
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anatole Nöstl
9 papers receiving 496 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 204
- Marketing 148
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 101
- Plant Science 92
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Anatole Nöstl
This map shows the geographic impact of Anatole Nöstl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anatole Nöstl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anatole Nöstl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anatole Nöstl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anatole Nöstl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anatole Nöstl. The network helps show where Anatole Nöstl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anatole Nöstl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anatole Nöstl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anatole Nöstl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anatole Nöstl. Anatole Nöstl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 157 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Acoustical conditions in the classroom : Recall of spoken words in English and Swedish heard at different signal-to-noise ratios | 1 |
| 5 | 140 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | Acoustical conditions in the classroom II: Recall of spoken words in English and Swedish heard at different signal-to-noise ratios | 1 |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 63 |
About Anatole Nöstl
Anatole Nöstl is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (148 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (204 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (15 citations). Anatole Nöstl has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patrik Sörqvist, John E. Marsh, Andreas Haga, Linda Langeborg, Mattias Holmgren, Niklas Halin, Anders Kjellberg, Staffan Hygge, Dylan M. Jones and Robert Ljung. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.