Anatole Beck
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Donald J. NewmanMicah BeckSteve AlpernJ. T. SchwartzDonald W. CroweM. N. BleicherA. SimónH. H. Corson
- Topics
- Optimization and Search Problems (12 papers)advanced mathematical theories (9 papers)Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Anatole Beck
46 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Computer Networks and Communications 335
- Mathematical Physics 190
- Management Science and Operations Research 167
- Geometry and Topology 124
- Artificial Intelligence 87
Countries citing papers authored by Anatole Beck
This map shows the geographic impact of Anatole Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anatole Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anatole Beck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anatole Beck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anatole Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anatole Beck. The network helps show where Anatole Beck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anatole Beck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anatole Beck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anatole Beck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anatole Beck. Anatole Beck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | The decimal dysfunction | 0 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | Une loi forte des grands nombres dans des espaces de Banach uniformément convexes | 1 |
About Anatole Beck
Anatole Beck is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Management Science and Operations Research and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 58 papers that have together received 727 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimization and Search Problems (12 papers), advanced mathematical theories (9 papers) and Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (190 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (335 citations) and Geometry and Topology (124 citations). Anatole Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Donald J. Newman, Micah Beck, Steve Alpern, J. T. Schwartz, Donald W. Crowe, M. N. Bleicher, A. Simón, H. H. Corson, Wei Shi Lim and Daniel P. Giesy. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Operations Research and Annals of Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.