Anand M. Goel
- Accounting top 0.5%
- Finance top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anjan V. ThakorSanjay DeshmukhKeith M. HoweDionysios LogothetisK. G. RamakrishnanVikram K. NandaM. P. NarayananFenghua Song
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (15 papers)Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumIndia
In The Last Decade
Anand M. Goel
30 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Accounting 1.3k
- Finance 764
- Strategy and Management 426
- Economics and Econometrics 408
- Safety Research 100
Countries citing papers authored by Anand M. Goel
This map shows the geographic impact of Anand M. Goel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anand M. Goel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anand M. Goel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anand M. Goel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anand M. Goel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anand M. Goel. The network helps show where Anand M. Goel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anand M. Goel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anand M. Goel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anand M. Goel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anand M. Goel. Anand M. Goel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | Economic Consequences: The Real Costs of U.S. Securities Class Action Litigation | 1 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | Do Envious CEOs Cause Merger Waves | 23 |
| 11 | Overconfidence, CEO Selection, and Corporate Governancebreakdown → | 558 |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | Why Do Firms Smooth Earnings | 4 |
| 15 | 202 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Anand M. Goel
Anand M. Goel is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (15 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.3k citations), Finance (764 citations) and Strategy and Management (426 citations). Anand M. Goel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and India. Frequent co-authors include Anjan V. Thakor, Sanjay Deshmukh, Keith M. Howe, Dionysios Logothetis, K. G. Ramakrishnan, Vikram K. Nanda, M. P. Narayanan, Fenghua Song, Howard Beales and Mukesh Bajaj. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Review of Financial Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.