Anabel Ford

1.2k citations
46 papers · 654 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anabel Ford

44 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers

Anabel Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Space and Planetary Science 97
  • Paleontology 377
  • Archeology 49
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 94
  • Geography, Planning and Development 108
Replace Julie A. Hoggarth with:
Julie A. Hoggarth United States
Jon C. Lohse United States
Marcello A. Canuto United States
Paul F. Healy Canada
T. Patrick Culbert United States
Daniel A. Contreras United States
Marilyn A. Masson United States
Joseph W. Ball United States
Elliot M. Abrams United States
Payson Sheets United States
Anabel Ford relative to Julie A. Hoggarth United States Julie A. Hoggarth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Julie A. Hoggarth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anabel Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anabel Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabel Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabel Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anabel Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabel Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabel Ford. The network helps show where Anabel Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anabel Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anabel Ford Line = papers co-authored together Anabel Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 20240
4 20231
5 20231
6 20212
7 20214
8 201531
9 201412
10 20132
11 20137
12 200936
13 20052
14 19991
15 19947
16 19913
17 199125
18 199069
19
Conditions for the evolution of complex societies : the development of the central lowland Maya
19814
20 198045

About Anabel Ford

Anabel Ford is a scholar working on Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Anthropology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Archeology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (24 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (6 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers), Latin American history and culture (5 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (5 papers) and Mexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (97 citations), Paleontology (377 citations), Archeology (49 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (94 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (108 citations). Anabel Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Nigh, Scott L. Fedick, Jeanne E. Arnold, Keith Clarke, Gary M. Feinman, William I. Rose, Gary L. Raines, Martha J. Macri, Thomas J. Pingel and Justin Tran. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnobiology, American Antiquity, Ancient Mesoamerica, Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association and Current Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026