Anabel Belaus

932 total citations
10 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Anabel Belaus is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Anabel Belaus has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Anabel Belaus's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Social Skills and Education (2 papers). Anabel Belaus is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Social Skills and Education (2 papers). Anabel Belaus collaborates with scholars based in Argentina, Australia and Philippines. Anabel Belaus's co-authors include Cecilia Reyna, Débora Jeanette Mola, María Victoria Ortiz, Esteban Freidín, Débora Inés Burín, Juan Carlos Godoy, Kohinoor Monish Darda, Pablo Correa, Dana Basnight-Brown and Chun‐Chia Kung and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Collabra Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Anabel Belaus

10 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anabel Belaus Argentina	6	22	17	12	11	8	10	62
María Victoria Ortiz Argentina	5	15 0.7×	17 1.0×	15 1.3×	11 1.0×	5 0.6×	13	59
Sonja Grelle Germany	4	38 1.7×	20 1.2×	20 1.7×	8 0.7×	7 0.9×	7	93
Narine Khachatryan Armenia	3	29 1.3×	17 1.0×	13 1.1×	2 0.2×	2 0.3×	6	51
Marc Yancy Lucas Mexico	3	9 0.4×	14 0.8×	8 0.7×	3 0.3×	4 0.5×	5	41
Kosta Bovan Croatia	4	37 1.7×	3 0.2×	9 0.8×	1 0.1×	6 0.8×	15	73
George Slusser United States	7	40 1.8×	3 0.2×	7 0.6×	4 0.4×	8 1.0×	34	113
Danielle Goldwert United States	4	77 3.5×	36 2.1×	8 0.7×		2 0.3×	8	91
Luigi Butera Denmark	5	43 2.0×	8 0.5×	11 0.9×	1 0.1×	23 2.9×	11	104
Susan Sullivan United States	5	38 1.7×	39 2.3×	9 0.8×	28 2.5×	1 0.1×	9	81
Dmitrii Dubrov Russia	5	38 1.7×	2 0.1×	25 2.1×	15 1.4×		14	63

Countries citing papers authored by Anabel Belaus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anabel Belaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabel Belaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabel Belaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anabel Belaus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabel Belaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabel Belaus. The network helps show where Anabel Belaus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anabel Belaus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anabel Belaus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anabel Belaus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anabel Belaus. Anabel Belaus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Belaus, Anabel, Débora Jeanette Mola, Pablo Correa, & Cecilia Reyna. (2022). Mach-IV: Evidence of Structural, Discriminant and Predictive Validity with Argentinian Students. Revista de psicología. 31(1). 13–26. 2 indexed citations

Steltenpohl, Crystal N., Dana Basnight-Brown, Natalia Bezerra Dutra, et al.. (2021). Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science Global Engagement Task Force Report. Collabra Psychology. 7(1). 7 indexed citations

Reyna, Cecilia, et al.. (2018). Validating the Structure of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale among Argentine Citizens through Different Approaches. Pensamiento Psicológico. 16(1). 107–118. 16 indexed citations

Belaus, Anabel, Cecilia Reyna, & Esteban Freidín. (2018). Testing the effect of cooperative/competitive priming on the Prisoner’s Dilemma. A replication study. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0209263–e0209263. 2 indexed citations

Belaus, Anabel, et al.. (2018). Further considerations regarding PANAS: Contributions from four studies with different Argentinean samples. Suma Psicológica. 25(2). 133–145. 5 indexed citations

Reyna, Cecilia, et al.. (2018). Social Values Orientation Measure Scale: Evidences of validity and reliability among Argentine undergraduate students. Conicet. 2 indexed citations

Reyna, Cecilia, et al.. (2017). Validez estructural de la Escala del Nuevo Paradigma Ecológico en ciudadanos argentinos utilizando diferentes abordajes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 16(1). 15 indexed citations

Belaus, Anabel, Cecilia Reyna, & Esteban Freidín. (2016). Medición y manipulación de normas sociales en juegos experimentales de corrupción. Cuadernos de Economía. 35(68). 353–377. 5 indexed citations

Belaus, Anabel, et al.. (2015). Is the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale appropriate to detect Mild Cognitive Impairment. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 10(1). 8–13. 2 indexed citations

10.

Mola, Débora Jeanette, et al.. (2013). Valoracion psicometrica de la Psychological Entitlement Scale desde la Teoria clasica de los tests y la Teoria de respuesta al item. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact