Ana Benítez‐López
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Co-authors
- Rob AlkemadeP.A. VerweijMark A. J. HuijbregtsAafke M. SchipperLuca SantiniDaniel J. IngramJasper A.J. EikelboomW. de Vries
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (35 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (30 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Ana Benítez‐López
54 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Ecology 2.0k
- Ecological Modeling 770
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 753
- Global and Planetary Change 686
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 570
Countries citing papers authored by Ana Benítez‐López
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Benítez‐López's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Benítez‐López with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Benítez‐López more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Benítez‐López
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Benítez‐López. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Benítez‐López. The network helps show where Ana Benítez‐López may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Benítez‐López
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Benítez‐López. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Benítez‐López based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Benítez‐López. Ana Benítez‐López is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 100 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | Assessing the reliability of species distribution projections in climate change researchbreakdown → | 184 |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | 174 | |
| 20 | 141 |
About Ana Benítez‐López
Ana Benítez‐López is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 59 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (35 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (30 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (770 citations), Ecology (2.0k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (753 citations). Ana Benítez‐López has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rob Alkemade, P.A. Verweij, Mark A. J. Huijbregts, Aafke M. Schipper, Luca Santini, Daniel J. Ingram, Jasper A.J. Eikelboom, W. de Vries, Michael P. Perring and Gabriele Midolo. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Environmental Science & Technology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.