Ana B. Ropero
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ãngel NadalPaloma Alonso‐MagdalenaEsther FuentesIván QuesadaBernat SoriaSergi SorianoOuahiba LaribiCristina Ripoll
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (18 papers)Estrogen and related hormone effects (13 papers)Nutritional Studies and Diet (9 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLoS ONEThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Ana B. Ropero
40 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.2k
- Genetics 805
- Molecular Biology 546
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 468
- Surgery 386
Countries citing papers authored by Ana B. Ropero
This map shows the geographic impact of Ana B. Ropero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana B. Ropero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana B. Ropero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ana B. Ropero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana B. Ropero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana B. Ropero. The network helps show where Ana B. Ropero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana B. Ropero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana B. Ropero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana B. Ropero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana B. Ropero. Ana B. Ropero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 285 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 229 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 128 | |
| 16 | 154 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 235 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About Ana B. Ropero
Ana B. Ropero is a scholar working on Genetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (18 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (13 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.2k citations), Genetics (805 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (468 citations). Ana B. Ropero has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ãngel Nadal, Paloma Alonso‐Magdalena, Esther Fuentes, Iván Quesada, Bernat Soria, Sergi Soriano, Ouahiba Laribi, Cristina Ripoll, Marjorie Maillet and Enrico Stefani. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.