Ana Aliverti

23 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Ana Aliverti
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 350
  • Political Science and International Relations 138
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • General Health Professions 57
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 30
Replace Juliet P. Stumpf with:
Juliet P. Stumpf United States
Kristin Golden United States
Laura Piacentini United Kingdom
Maartje van der Woude Netherlands
Angela Behrens United States
Gabriella Sanchez United States
Helen Taylor Greene United States
Pauline Aarten Netherlands
Richard G. Greenleaf United States
Inge Vanfraechem Belgium
Ana Aliverti relative to Juliet P. Stumpf United States Juliet P. Stumpf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Juliet P. Stumpf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Aliverti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Aliverti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Aliverti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Aliverti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Aliverti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Aliverti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Aliverti. The network helps show where Ana Aliverti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana Aliverti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana Aliverti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana Aliverti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana Aliverti. Ana Aliverti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 1
4 5
5 14
6 33
7 4
8 10
9 22
10 3
11 5
12 5
13 14
14
Introduction to the special issue on criminal justice adjudication in the age of migration
1
15 9
16
Sentencing in immigration-related cases : the impact of deportability and immigration status
3
17
Crimes of Mobility: Criminal Law and the Regulation of Immigration
37
18 57
19 12
20 1

About Ana Aliverti

Ana Aliverti is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 25 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (350 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (138 citations). Ana Aliverti has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Argentina and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anastasia Chamberlen, Máximo Sozzo, Mary Bosworth, Juliet P. Stumpf, Sanja Milivojević, Tony Platt, Helene O. I. Gundhus, Rashawn Ray, Tara J. Melish and Doris Marie Provine. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Theoretical Criminology and Punishment & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026