Amy Zegart
-
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy 16
- Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies 6
- International Relations and Foreign Policy 2
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 1
- International Law and Human Rights 1
- Public Administration top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 2
-
- Defense, Military, and Policy Studies 2
-
- Social Media and Politics 1
- Journals
- Foreign Affairs (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Political Science Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesKenya
In The Last Decade
Amy Zegart
26 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Political Science and International Relations 242
- Public Administration 31
- Strategy and Management 45
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Information Systems 24
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Zegart
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Zegart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Zegart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Zegart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Zegart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Zegart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Zegart. The network helps show where Amy Zegart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Amy Zegart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spies, Lies, and Algorithms: Why U.S. Intelligence Agencies Must Adapt or Fail | 2019 | 4 |
| 2 | Bytes, Bombs, and Spies: The Strategic Dimensions of Offensive Cyber Operations | 2019 | 6 |
| 3 | Political Risk: How Businesses and Organizations Can Anticipate Global Insecurity | 2018 | 4 |
| 4 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | Stop Drinking the Weak Sauce | 2015 | 0 |
| 7 | Controversy Dims as Public Opinion Shifts | 2013 | 1 |
| 8 | The Cuban Missile Crisis as Intelligence Failure | 2012 | 5 |
| 9 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 13 | Universities Must Not Ignore Intelligence Research. | 2007 | 2 |
| 14 | 2007 | 55 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 15 |
About Amy Zegart
Amy Zegart is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Forestry and Transportation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (16 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (6 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and International Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (242 citations), Public Administration (31 citations) and Strategy and Management (45 citations). Amy Zegart has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Lin, Condoleezza Rice, Joshua Rovner, Austin Long and John Prados. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, The American Historical Review and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.