Amy Zang
- Accounting top 0.5%
- Strategy and Management top 1%
- Finance top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Allen HuangRong ZhengShivaram RajgopalJennifer FrancisReuven LehavyJoanna S. WuAn‐Ping LinRichard H. Willis
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (18 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (9 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Amy Zang
22 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Accounting 2.2k
- Strategy and Management 1.1k
- Finance 797
- Economics and Econometrics 252
- Management Science and Operations Research 214
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Zang
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Zang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Zang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Zang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Zang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Zang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Zang. The network helps show where Amy Zang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Zang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Zang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Zang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Zang. Amy Zang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approachbreakdown → | 367 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Analyst Information Discovery and Interpretation Roles: A Topic Modeling Approach | 2 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | A Thematic Analysis of Analyst Information Discovery and Information Interpretation Roles | 5 |
| 10 | Large Sample Evidence on the Informativeness of Text in Analyst Reports | 3 |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | Evidence on the Trade-Off between Real Activities Manipulation and Accrual-Based Earnings Managementbreakdown → | 1041 |
| 13 | Informativeness of Text in Analyst Reports: A Naïve Bayes Machine Learning Approach | 3 |
| 14 | 95 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 427 | |
| 18 | 156 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Amy Zang
Amy Zang is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Management Information Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (18 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (9 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (2.2k citations), Finance (797 citations) and Strategy and Management (1.1k citations). Amy Zang has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Allen Huang, Rong Zheng, Shivaram Rajgopal, Jennifer Francis, Reuven Lehavy, Joanna S. Wu, An‐Ping Lin and Richard H. Willis. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Journal of Accounting and Economics and The Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.