Amy Proctor
Impact in
- Filtration and Separation top 2%
- Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
- Catalysis top 10%
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
Papers in
-
- Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions 6
-
- Ionic liquids properties and applications 3
- Co-authors
- William E. AcreeLaura M. SprungerMichael H. AbrahamSarah C. HeilshornAlia P. SchoenBrad A. KrajinaAndrew J. SpakowitzShamik Mascharak
- Journals
- Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data (2 papers)Fluid Phase Equilibria (2 papers)Biomaterials (1 paper)Integrative Biology (1 paper)Progress in Materials Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amy Proctor
11 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Filtration and Separation 109
- Catalysis 151
- Spectroscopy 235
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 28
- Electrochemistry 28
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Proctor
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Proctor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Proctor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Proctor. The network helps show where Amy Proctor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Amy Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 81 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 67 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 97 | |
| 12 | Minimization of the surface roughness of gold films for Casimir force measurements | 2006 | 1 |
About Amy Proctor
Amy Proctor is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Catalysis, Spectroscopy, Process Chemistry and Technology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (3 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (3 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (1 paper) and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (109 citations), Catalysis (151 citations), Spectroscopy (235 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (28 citations) and Electrochemistry (28 citations). Amy Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William E. Acree, Laura M. Sprunger, Michael H. Abraham, Sarah C. Heilshorn, Alia P. Schoen, Brad A. Krajina, Andrew J. Spakowitz, Shamik Mascharak, Jared L. Anderson and Yunjing Meng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Fluid Phase Equilibria, Biomaterials, Integrative Biology and Progress in Materials Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.