Amy M. Jimenez
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael F. GreenMark M. KishiyamaLee M. PerryW. Thomas BoyceRobert T. KnightJunghee LeeJonathan K. WynnEric A. Reavis
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySweden
In The Last Decade
Amy M. Jimenez
33 papers receiving 859 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 437
- Psychiatry and Mental health 274
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 187
- Clinical Psychology 172
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 119
Countries citing papers authored by Amy M. Jimenez
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy M. Jimenez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy M. Jimenez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy M. Jimenez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy M. Jimenez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy M. Jimenez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy M. Jimenez. The network helps show where Amy M. Jimenez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy M. Jimenez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy M. Jimenez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy M. Jimenez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy M. Jimenez. Amy M. Jimenez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About Amy M. Jimenez
Amy M. Jimenez is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 890 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (437 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (274 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (187 citations). Amy M. Jimenez has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Michael F. Green, Mark M. Kishiyama, Lee M. Perry, W. Thomas Boyce, Robert T. Knight, Junghee Lee, Jonathan K. Wynn, Eric A. Reavis, Tyrone D. Cannon and Joseph Ventura. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.