Amy L. Minkalis
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Surgery
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Robert ViningCheryl HawkCynthia R. LongClinton J. DanielsRaheleh KhorsanJordan A. GliedtKatie de LucaChristine Goertz
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPatient Education and CounselingBMC Health Services Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amy L. Minkalis
13 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Pharmacology 163
- Surgery 84
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
- Psychiatry and Mental health 33
- Cognitive Neuroscience 28
Countries citing papers authored by Amy L. Minkalis
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy L. Minkalis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy L. Minkalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy L. Minkalis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy L. Minkalis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy L. Minkalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy L. Minkalis. The network helps show where Amy L. Minkalis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy L. Minkalis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy L. Minkalis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy L. Minkalis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy L. Minkalis. Amy L. Minkalis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | A systematic review of thrust manipulation combined with one conservative intervention for rotator cuff and related non-surgical shoulder conditions. | 4 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 48 |
About Amy L. Minkalis
Amy L. Minkalis is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Occupational Therapy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (4 citations), Pharmacology (163 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations). Amy L. Minkalis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Vining, Cheryl Hawk, Cynthia R. Long, Clinton J. Daniels, Raheleh Khorsan, Jordan A. Gliedt, Katie de Luca, Christine Goertz, Ronald J. Farabaugh and Ting Xia. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Patient Education and Counseling and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.