Amy Krings

856 total citations
36 papers, 478 citations indexed

About

Amy Krings is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Krings has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 478 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 16 papers in General Health Professions and 14 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Amy Krings's work include Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (15 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (14 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers). Amy Krings is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (15 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (14 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers). Amy Krings collaborates with scholars based in United States, Finland and Ireland. Amy Krings's co-authors include Samantha Teixeira, Tania M. Schusler, Brian E. Perron, Bryan G. Victor, Dana Kornberg, Lorraine Gutiérrez, Linda Sprague Martínez, Finn McLafferty Bell, Mary L. Ohmer and Gregory B. Markus and has published in prestigious journals such as Landscape and Urban Planning, Sustainability and Children and Youth Services Review.

In The Last Decade

Amy Krings

32 papers receiving 455 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy Krings United States	13	257	155	145	51	51	36	478
Heather Boetto Australia	12	181 0.7×	196 1.3×	227 1.6×	13 0.3×	81 1.6×	34	454
Kati Närhi Finland	12	124 0.5×	177 1.1×	175 1.2×	16 0.3×	28 0.5×	27	359
Kenneth M. Reardon United States	12	131 0.5×	90 0.6×	42 0.3×	9 0.2×	204 4.0×	23	405
Tony Fitzpatrick United Kingdom	13	181 0.7×	104 0.7×	42 0.3×	20 0.4×	39 0.8×	51	474
Lieve Bradt Belgium	14	215 0.8×	137 0.9×	177 1.2×	34 0.7×	142 2.8×	59	523
Eleanor Jupp United Kingdom	13	260 1.0×	131 0.8×	25 0.2×	10 0.2×	58 1.1×	22	426
Laurie Ross United States	13	172 0.7×	108 0.7×	18 0.1×	26 0.5×	84 1.6×	32	456
Karen Umemoto United States	13	198 0.8×	100 0.6×	17 0.1×	7 0.1×	66 1.3×	37	424
John J. Betancur United States	12	319 1.2×	83 0.5×	28 0.2×	28 0.5×	21 0.4×	24	562
Naomi Joy Godden Australia	11	156 0.6×	67 0.4×	26 0.2×	34 0.7×	29 0.6×	22	287

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Krings

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Krings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Krings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Krings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Krings

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Krings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Krings. The network helps show where Amy Krings may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Krings

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Krings. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Krings based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Krings. Amy Krings is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Young, Rachel, et al.. (2025). Predictors of political participation of U.S. social workers: the mediating effect of confidence. Social Work Education. 45(1). 163–180. 1 indexed citations

Mason, Lisa Reyes, et al.. (2024). Environmental Justice and Social Work: A Study across Practice Settings in Three U.S. States. Sustainability. 16(19). 8361–8361. 2 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2024). Applying a Human Rights Framework to the Just Transition: Implications for Social Work. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work. 10(2). 346–352. 2 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2024). Contested places: A typology for responding to place-based harms. Journal of Social Work. 24(5). 685–704. 1 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). Building or Burning: Critical Reflections on Social and Political Change. PubMed Central. 4(1). 5–10.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). Abolitionism and Ecosocial Work: Towards Equity, Liberation and Environmental Justice. The British Journal of Social Work. 54(4). 1402–1419. 5 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). Which Environmental Social Work? Environmentalisms, Social Justice, and the Dilemmas Ahead. Social Service Review. 97(3). 569–601. 6 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). How COVID-19 and Racial Justice Protests Influenced Social Workers’ Perceptions of Policy and Political Participation. Social Work Research. 47(4). 261–273. 1 indexed citations

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). The challenges of “Moving at the Speed of Trust”: how women navigate new public management dynamics in power-based community organizations. Journal of Community Practice. 31(1). 24–43. 2 indexed citations

10.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2023). Fat Liberation: How Social Workers Can Incorporate Fat Activism to Promote Care and Justice. Affilia. 38(4). 724–731. 1 indexed citations

11.

Schusler, Tania M., et al.. (2020). Environmental Gentrification in Chicago: Perceptions, Dilemmas and Paths Forward. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago). 2 indexed citations

12.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2020). Environmental Justice Organizing in a Gentrifying Community: Navigating Dilemmas of Representation, Issue Selection, and Recruitment. Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 102(2). 154–166. 18 indexed citations

13.

Markus, Gregory B. & Amy Krings. (2020). Planning, participation, and power in a shrinking city: The Detroit Works Project. Journal of Urban Affairs. 42(8). 1141–1163. 14 indexed citations

14.

Teixeira, Samantha, et al.. (2019). The future of environmental social work: Looking to community initiatives for models of prevention. Journal of Community Practice. 27(3-4). 414–429. 15 indexed citations

15.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2019). Resisting gentrification: The theoretical and practice contributions of social work. Journal of Social Work. 21(1). 26–45. 31 indexed citations

16.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2019). Recalibrating micro and macro social work: student perceptions of social action. Social Work Education. 39(2). 160–174. 12 indexed citations

17.

Schusler, Tania M. & Amy Krings. (2018). Addressing Environmental Gentrification: Improving Environmental Health for Children and Youth without Displacement. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University of Chicago). 1 indexed citations

18.

Hawkins, Jaclynn, et al.. (2018). Investigating Diversity in Social Work Doctoral Education in the United States. Journal of Social Work Education. 54(4). 762–775. 12 indexed citations

19.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2018). Mothers' perceptions of educational access and engagement in a context of urban austerity. Children and Youth Services Review. 88. 298–307. 1 indexed citations

20.

Krings, Amy, et al.. (2015). The Comparative Impacts of Social Justice Educational Methods on Political Participation, Civic Engagement, and Multicultural Activism. Equity & Excellence in Education. 48(3). 403–417. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact