Amy Frary

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Amy Frary is a scholar working on Plant Science, Endocrinology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Frary has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Endocrinology and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Amy Frary's work include Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (5 papers), Research in Cotton Cultivation (3 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers). Amy Frary is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (5 papers), Research in Cotton Cultivation (3 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers). Amy Frary collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and France. Amy Frary's co-authors include Anne Frary, Steven D. Tanksley, Silvana Grandillo, Bin Cong, Ron Elber, Kevin B. Alpert, Jarek Meller, Jiping Liu, Teresa Nesbitt and Esther van der Knaap and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Food Chemistry and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Amy Frary

14 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

fw2.2 : A Quantitative Trait Locus Key to the Evolution o... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy Frary United States 10 1.3k 609 530 82 79 15 1.6k
Lorenzo Barchi Italy 25 1.3k 1.0× 547 0.9× 487 0.9× 103 1.3× 72 0.9× 55 1.6k
Guoyi Gong China 26 1.7k 1.3× 1.1k 1.8× 739 1.4× 101 1.2× 80 1.0× 48 2.0k
Hamid Ashrafi United States 22 1.6k 1.2× 716 1.2× 256 0.5× 71 0.9× 113 1.4× 56 1.9k
Theresa Hill United States 21 1.8k 1.3× 1.3k 2.1× 203 0.4× 38 0.5× 100 1.3× 32 2.1k
Cecilia McGregor United States 19 1.1k 0.8× 357 0.6× 631 1.2× 150 1.8× 19 0.2× 54 1.3k
Sung‐Chur Sim South Korea 24 1.6k 1.2× 541 0.9× 595 1.1× 49 0.6× 22 0.3× 63 1.8k
Qunfeng Lou China 24 1.3k 1.0× 653 1.1× 603 1.1× 43 0.5× 16 0.2× 93 1.5k
Su Ryun Choi South Korea 25 1.5k 1.1× 895 1.5× 270 0.5× 36 0.4× 64 0.8× 62 1.7k
Weichao Fang China 20 1.0k 0.8× 721 1.2× 126 0.2× 88 1.1× 125 1.6× 58 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Frary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Frary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Frary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Frary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Frary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Frary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Frary. The network helps show where Amy Frary may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Frary

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Frary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Frary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Frary. Amy Frary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Cammareri, Maria, et al.. (2024). Genetic and Biotechnological Approaches to Improve Fruit Bioactive Content: A Focus on Eggplant and Tomato Anthocyanins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 25(12). 6811–6811. 4 indexed citations
2.
Doğanlar, Sami, et al.. (2021). Molecular Genetic Characterization of the Turkish National Green Plum (Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.) Collection. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 31(1). 61–73. 2 indexed citations
4.
Frary, Amy, et al.. (2019). Association mapping of agro-morphological traits in European hazelnut (Corylus avellana). Euphytica. 215(2). 7 indexed citations
5.
Çolak, Nergiz Gürbüz, Selman Uluışık, Anne Frary, Amy Frary, & Sami Doğanlar. (2018). Health benefits and bioactive compounds of eggplant. Food Chemistry. 268. 602–610. 184 indexed citations
6.
Başal, Hüseyin, et al.. (2018). Identification of stable QTLs for fiber quality and plant structure in Upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) under drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products. 124. 776–786. 15 indexed citations
7.
Başal, Hüseyin, et al.. (2018). Genome-wide association mapping of yield components and drought tolerance-related traits in cotton. Molecular Breeding. 38(6). 11 indexed citations
10.
Uncu, Ali Tevfik, İbrahim Çelik, Zübeyir Devran, et al.. (2015). Development of a SNP-based CAPS assay for the Me1 gene conferring resistance to root knot nematode in pepper. Euphytica. 206(2). 393–399. 21 indexed citations
12.
Inoue, Maiko, et al.. (2013). A measure of genetic diversity of goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis L.) by RAPD analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 60(3). 1201–1207.
13.
14.
Frary, Anne, Teresa Nesbitt, Amy Frary, et al.. (2000). fw2.2 : A Quantitative Trait Locus Key to the Evolution of Tomato Fruit Size. Science. 289(5476). 85–88. 1035 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Brommonschenkel, Sérgio Hermínio, Amy Frary, Anne Frary, & Steven D. Tanksley. (2000). The Broad-Spectrum Tospovirus Resistance Gene Sw-5 of Tomato Is a Homolog of the Root-Knot Nematode Resistance Gene Mi. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 13(10). 1130–1138. 145 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026