Amy E. Ritterbusch
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Safety Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sandra GarcíaIan W. HollowayJennifer J. MootzKhudejha AsgharCatherine PoultonMendy MarshLindsay StarkCyril Bennouna
- Topics
- Children's Rights and Participation (6 papers)Sex work and related issues (5 papers)Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesColombiaPeru
In The Last Decade
Amy E. Ritterbusch
26 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 146
- General Health Professions 78
- Clinical Psychology 75
- Social Psychology 52
- Safety Research 46
Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Ritterbusch
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Ritterbusch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Ritterbusch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Ritterbusch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Ritterbusch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Ritterbusch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Ritterbusch. The network helps show where Amy E. Ritterbusch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Ritterbusch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Ritterbusch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Ritterbusch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Ritterbusch. Amy E. Ritterbusch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | The Quantitative Tactics Used to Delegitimize a Right to the City Social Justice Movement in Bogotá, Colombia | 2 |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | Análisis de la situación de la pobreza infantil en Colombia | 2 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Amy E. Ritterbusch
Amy E. Ritterbusch is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and General Social Sciences, having authored 29 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Children's Rights and Participation (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (46 citations), Health (45 citations) and Clinical Psychology (75 citations). Amy E. Ritterbusch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Sandra García, Ian W. Holloway, Jennifer J. Mootz, Khudejha Asghar, Catherine Poulton, Mendy Marsh, Lindsay Stark, Cyril Bennouna, Sarah R. Meyer and Alina Potts. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, AIDS and Behavior and Antipode.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.