Amy Corderoy

732 citations
7 papers · 419 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 4
    • Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 3
    • Psychiatric care and mental health services 2
    • Mental Health Treatment and Access 4

Amy Corderoy

7 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Amy Corderoy
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Clinical Psychology 350
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 97
  • Social Psychology 129
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
Replace Austin J. Gallyer with:
Austin J. Gallyer United States
Brian W. Bauer United States
Laura Paashaus Germany
Bruce Leeson United States
Eliane Sommerfeld Israel
Leah Shelef Israel
Kalina N. Babeva United States
Samantha A. Chalker United States
Christine Yuodelis‐Flores United States
Kathryn P. Linthicum United States
Amy Corderoy relative to Austin J. Gallyer United States Austin J. Gallyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Austin J. Gallyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Corderoy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Corderoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Corderoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Corderoy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Corderoy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Corderoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Corderoy. The network helps show where Amy Corderoy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Amy Corderoy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Corderoy Line = papers co-authored together Amy Corderoy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2019144
2 2019128
3 202086
4 201750
5 20246
6 20244
7 20241

About Amy Corderoy

Amy Corderoy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (350 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (97 citations), Social Psychology (129 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). Amy Corderoy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Large, Catherine McHugh, Ian B. Hickie, Christopher Ryan, Daniel F. Hermens, Michael Davidson, Hannah Myles, Mark Weiser, Lisa Brophy and Grant Sara. Their work appears in journals such as BJPsych Open, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Psychiatry Psychology and Law and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact