Amos Ν. Wilder

618 total citations
31 papers, 160 citations indexed

About

Amos Ν. Wilder is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amos Ν. Wilder has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 160 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Religious studies, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Amos Ν. Wilder's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (22 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers). Amos Ν. Wilder is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (22 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers). Amos Ν. Wilder collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amos Ν. Wilder's co-authors include C. H. Dodd, Floyd V. Filson, William R. Farmer, M.V. Williams, Ernst Fuchs, Thomas J. Heffernan and Alan Richardson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Negro Education, The Classical World and Journal of Biblical Literature.

In The Last Decade

Amos Ν. Wilder

23 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

Amos Ν. Wilder
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Religious studies 91
  • Sociology and Political Science 62
  • Philosophy 37
  • History 19
  • Archeology 16
Replace Edmond Jacob with:
Edmond Jacob United Kingdom
Danna Nolan Fewell United States
Thomas J. J. Altizer United States
James Muilenburg United States
Robert Polzin United States
Aidan Nichols United Kingdom
Regina Schwartz United States
Frank R. Podgorski
Helmer Ringgren
Norman K. Gottwald Brazil
Edmond Jacob United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Amos Ν. Wilder
Amos Ν. Wilder · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Amos Ν. Wilder
Amos Ν. Wilder · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Amos Ν. Wilder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amos Ν. Wilder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amos Ν. Wilder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amos Ν. Wilder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amos Ν. Wilder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amos Ν. Wilder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amos Ν. Wilder. The network helps show where Amos Ν. Wilder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amos Ν. Wilder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amos Ν. Wilder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amos Ν. Wilder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amos Ν. Wilder. Amos Ν. Wilder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
New Testament faith for today
0
2 1
3 12
4 3
5 9
6
Jesus' Parables and the War of Myths: Essays on Imagination in the Scripture
4
7 36
8 12
9
Early Christian Rhetoric: The Language of the Gospel
16
10 2
11 1
12 3
13 8
14 2
15 2
16 4
17
Modern Poetry and the Christian Tradition: A Study in the Relation of Christianity to Culture
1
18 0
19 4
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026