Amos Azaria

68 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

The DARPA Twitter Bot Challenge 2016 · 251 citations
251201620262019202250100150200250

Peers

Amos Azaria
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Health Informatics 32
  • Computer Science Applications 109
  • Artificial Intelligence 548
  • Information Systems 370
  • General Decision Sciences 23
Replace Nava Tintarev with:
Nava Tintarev United Kingdom
Maarten van Someren Netherlands
Alessandro Bozzon Netherlands
Kevin Waugh United Kingdom
Simon Miles United Kingdom
Chenhao Tan United States
Judy Goldsmith United States
Aad van Moorsel United Kingdom
Todd Kulesza United States
Julia Stoyanovich United States
Amos Azaria relative to Nava Tintarev United Kingdom Nava Tintarev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Nava Tintarev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amos Azaria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amos Azaria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amos Azaria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amos Azaria more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amos Azaria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amos Azaria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amos Azaria. The network helps show where Amos Azaria may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amos Azaria, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amos Azaria Line = papers co-authored together Amos Azaria links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20241
3 20231
4 202313
5 20222
6 20210
7 20211
8 202170
9 20214
10 202015
11 20202
12
Safebot: A Safe Collaborative Chatbot.
20182
13 201713
14 20151
15 201511
16 20144
17 20146
18 20144
19
Movie recommender system for profit maximization (short LBP)
20131
20 201126

About Amos Azaria

Amos Azaria is a scholar working on Health Informatics, General Decision Sciences, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research and Automotive Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transportation and Mobility Innovations (11 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (11 papers), Topic Modeling (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (8 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (7 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (7 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (32 citations), Computer Science Applications (109 citations), Artificial Intelligence (548 citations), Information Systems (370 citations) and General Decision Sciences (23 citations). Amos Azaria has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Sarit Kraus, V. S. Subrahmanian, Rina Azoulay, Tom M. Mitchell, Brad A. Myers, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Emilio Ferrara, Alessandro Flammini, Claudia V. Goldman and Kristina Lerman. Their work appears in journals such as Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Sensors, IEEE Access, Applied Sciences and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026