A.M.J. van Hoof

24 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

A.M.J. van Hoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Communication 398
  • Sociology and Political Science 210
  • Political Science and International Relations 187
  • Strategy and Management 49
  • Gender Studies 35
Replace Inka Salovaara‐Moring with:
Inka Salovaara‐Moring Finland
Florian Toepfl Germany
Julie Sevenans Belgium
Kevin Wallsten United States
Nicolas Hubé France
Matthijs Elenbaas Netherlands
Mark Blach‐Ørsten Denmark
Colleen J. Shogan United States
Sebastian Adrian Popa Germany
Annett Heft Germany
A.M.J. van Hoof relative to Inka Salovaara‐Moring Finland Inka Salovaara‐Moring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Inka Salovaara‐Moring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.M.J. van Hoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M.J. van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M.J. van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M.J. van Hoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M.J. van Hoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M.J. van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M.J. van Hoof. The network helps show where A.M.J. van Hoof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.M.J. van Hoof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.M.J. van Hoof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.M.J. van Hoof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.M.J. van Hoof. A.M.J. van Hoof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 5
3 24
4 8
5 17
6 4
7 22
8 39
9 12
10 54
11
“It really is a Craft”: Repertoires in Journalistic Frontrunners’ Talk on Audience Participation
6
12 43
13
Poor Framing in Television News: Redundancy Between Audio and Visual Modalities in Political News
1
14
The Influence of Internet Consultants
12
15
The influence of press releases on the use of strategic and issue frames in the Dutch election coverage 2006
1
16 3
17 68
18
De puinhopen in het nieuws: de rol van de media bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 2002
28
19 1
20 3

About A.M.J. van Hoof

A.M.J. van Hoof is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Media Studies and Communication (11 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (398 citations), Political Science and International Relations (187 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). A.M.J. van Hoof has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jan Kleinnijenhuis, Dirk Oegema, José Sanders, Wouter van Atteveldt, J.A. de Ridder, Irene Costera Meijer, R. Vliegenthart, André Krouwel, Nel Ruigrok and Carina Jacobi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, New Media & Society and Communication Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026