Amita Goyal
About
In The Last Decade
Amita Goyal
10 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Ophthalmology 152
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 109
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
- Molecular Biology 60
- Surgery 52
Countries citing papers authored by Amita Goyal
This map shows the geographic impact of Amita Goyal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amita Goyal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amita Goyal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amita Goyal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amita Goyal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amita Goyal. The network helps show where Amita Goyal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amita Goyal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amita Goyal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amita Goyal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amita Goyal. Amita Goyal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 131 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | Mentoring Resources and Programs for Woman. | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.