Amit M. Shah

1.4k citations
54 papers · 972 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Amit M. Shah

48 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers

Amit M. Shah
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Reproductive Medicine 363
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 192
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Judy V. Birch with:
Judy V. Birch United Kingdom
Susan E. Kirk United States
Aris Bechlioulis Greece
Hanna M. Zafar United States
Celeste Manfredi Italy
Fadi Mirza United States
Frits van Osch Netherlands
Katie E Webster United Kingdom
Konstantinos A. Papathanasiou Greece
Ana María Gómez Colombia
Amit M. Shah relative to Judy V. Birch United Kingdom Judy V. Birch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×70×
Judy V. Birch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit M. Shah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit M. Shah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit M. Shah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit M. Shah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit M. Shah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit M. Shah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit M. Shah. The network helps show where Amit M. Shah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amit M. Shah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit M. Shah Line = papers co-authored together Amit M. Shah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012161
2 2013125
3 201588
4 201460
5 201357
6 200954
7 201554
8 201742
9 201338
10 201333
11 201428
12 201621
13 201520
14 201519
15 201715
16 201915
17 201313
18 202111
19 201310
20 201510

About Amit M. Shah

Amit M. Shah is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (10 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (7 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (363 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (192 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Family Practice (7 citations). Amit M. Shah has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Anil Gudi, Roy Homburg, Apeksh Patwa, Priya Bhide, Arpita Ray, Peter Timms, Nassir Navab, Adrija Ray, Jennifer E. DeVoe and Rachel Benson Gold. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, National Journal of Physiology Pharmacy and Pharmacology, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery and Computer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact