Amina Amin

2.0k citations
17 papers · 99 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Surgical Simulation and Training 1
    • Case Reports on Hematomas 1
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 1

Amina Amin

15 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Amina Amin
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Emergency Medicine 10
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 24
  • Health Informatics 1
  • Surgery 28
  • Safety Research 5
Replace Gültekin Ozan Küçük with:
Gültekin Ozan Küçük Türkiye
Bernard Stacey United Kingdom
Sara Fra‐Fernández Spain
Prashant Singh India
Christiane Piepel Germany
Pål Galteland Norway
S Folkard United Kingdom
Rishi Trikha United States
Blake Martin United States
Özlem Yazıcıoğlu Moçin Türkiye
Amina Amin relative to Gültekin Ozan Küçük Türkiye Gültekin Ozan Küçük's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Gültekin Ozan Küçük · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Amin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Amin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Amin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Amin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Amin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Amin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Amin. The network helps show where Amina Amin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amina Amin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amina Amin Line = papers co-authored together Amina Amin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201927
2 201911
3 202111
4 20209
5 20219
6 20199
7 20228
8 20236
9 20192
10 20202
11 20241
12 20191
13 20241
14 20211
15 20241
16 20250
17 20240

About Amina Amin

Amina Amin is a scholar working on Surgery, Dermatology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Safety Research and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 99 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Case Reports on Hematomas (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (1 paper) and Water Quality Monitoring Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (10 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (24 citations), Health Informatics (1 citation), Surgery (28 citations) and Safety Research (5 citations). Amina Amin has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mohammed Amir, Tanvir Hasan, Shahzad Hussain, Samiullah Khan, Muhammad Asif Rasheed, Yu‐Ming Chu, Corrado Barbui, Aamer Ikram, Shamim Ahmed and Muhammad Awais. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive Health, Annals of Vascular Surgery, Psycho-Oncology, BMJ Global Health and Alexandria Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact