Ami Hommel

2.2k total citations
67 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Ami Hommel is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Ami Hommel has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Surgery, 24 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 14 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Ami Hommel's work include Hip and Femur Fractures (38 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (24 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (14 papers). Ami Hommel is often cited by papers focused on Hip and Femur Fractures (38 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (24 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (14 papers). Ami Hommel collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Ami Hommel's co-authors include Karl–Göran Thorngren, Karin Björkman Björkelund, Carina Bååth, Lena Gunningberg, Hans Wingstrand, Kerstin Ulander, Ewa Idvall, K.‐G. Thorngren, D. Lundberg and L. Gustafson and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Therapy, Osteoporosis International and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Ami Hommel

63 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ami Hommel Sweden 21 1.0k 518 304 238 206 67 1.6k
Jack Bell Australia 22 442 0.4× 170 0.3× 70 0.2× 61 0.3× 40 0.2× 67 1.1k
C H Rapin Switzerland 15 741 0.7× 125 0.2× 57 0.2× 42 0.2× 81 0.4× 28 1.9k
Merrilyn Banks Australia 29 847 0.8× 92 0.2× 353 1.2× 38 0.2× 185 0.9× 121 3.5k
C. Gene Cayten United States 24 600 0.6× 60 0.1× 164 0.5× 1.1k 4.5× 113 0.5× 64 1.7k
Michael Stenvall Sweden 16 621 0.6× 397 0.8× 22 0.1× 113 0.5× 13 0.1× 24 1.3k
Jan Tidermark Sweden 35 3.8k 3.7× 1.0k 2.0× 25 0.1× 223 0.9× 41 0.2× 55 4.1k
Paolo Chiari Italy 14 308 0.3× 106 0.2× 104 0.3× 82 0.3× 54 0.3× 46 728
Romke van Balen Netherlands 20 453 0.4× 185 0.4× 20 0.1× 185 0.8× 17 0.1× 45 1.1k
Manish K. Sethi United States 30 1.5k 1.5× 496 1.0× 9 0.0× 316 1.3× 50 0.2× 91 2.3k
Jeffrey I. Wallace United States 15 454 0.4× 453 0.9× 17 0.1× 62 0.3× 59 0.3× 21 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ami Hommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ami Hommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ami Hommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ami Hommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ami Hommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ami Hommel. The network helps show where Ami Hommel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ami Hommel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ami Hommel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ami Hommel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ami Hommel. Ami Hommel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bååth, Carina, et al.. (2025). Emergency Nurses’ Perceptions of Nursing Care in an Emergency Department: A Phenomenographic Study. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 51(5). 840–849.
2.
Kottner, Jan, et al.. (2025). Prognostic factors for incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): Results of an international expert survey. Journal of Tissue Viability. 34(4). 100952–100952.
3.
Eilegård, Alexandra, et al.. (2024). Prognostic factors for the development of incontinence‐associated dermatitis (IAD): A systematic review. International Wound Journal. 21(7). e14962–e14962. 4 indexed citations
4.
Hommel, Ami, et al.. (2024). Registered nurses’ experiences of communication with patients after the end-of-life breakpoint communication: A pilot interview study. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. 7. 100263–100263.
6.
Källman, Ulrika, et al.. (2022). Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention interventions – A ten‐year nationwide survey in Sweden. International Wound Journal. 19(7). 1736–1747. 20 indexed citations
7.
Sandberg, Magnus, Bodil Ivarsson, Anders Johansson, & Ami Hommel. (2022). Experiences of patients with hip fractures after discharge from hospital. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 46. 100941–100941. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hommel, Ami, et al.. (2021). Preceptors’ experiences of peer learning in an intensive care unit. Nurse Education in Practice. 54. 103086–103086. 7 indexed citations
9.
Hedström, Margareta, et al.. (2020). The Sernbo score as a predictor of 1-year mortality after hip fracture: a registry study on 55,716 patients. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 47(6). 2043–2048. 12 indexed citations
10.
Hommel, Ami, et al.. (2020). The effects of preoperative oral carbohydrate drinks on energy intake and postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery: A pilot study. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 41. 100834–100834. 3 indexed citations
11.
Hommel, Ami, et al.. (2019). Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events: A multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 102. 103473–103473. 15 indexed citations
12.
Nordström, Peter, et al.. (2018). Effects of Geriatric Team Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 19(10). 840–845. 41 indexed citations
13.
Hommel, Ami, et al.. (2018). Hip fractures – Treatment and functional outcome. The development over 25 years. Injury. 49(12). 2209–2215. 28 indexed citations
14.
Johansen, Antony, David Golding, Jacqueline Close, et al.. (2017). Using national hip fracture registries and audit databases to develop an international perspective. Injury. 48(10). 2174–2179. 87 indexed citations
15.
Nordström, Peter, et al.. (2017). Bisphosphonate Use After Hip Fracture in Older Adults: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 18(6). 515–521. 7 indexed citations
16.
Dobožinskas, Paulius, et al.. (2015). Changes In Care Management After “Fast Track” Protocol Introduction For Hip Fracture Patients. Sveikatos mokslai. 25(5). 126–130. 1 indexed citations
17.
Macijauskienė, Jūratė, et al.. (2012). Femoral neck fractures in Lithuania and Sweden. The differences in care and outcome. International Orthopaedics. 36(8). 1681–1686. 4 indexed citations
18.
Björkelund, Karin Björkman, Ami Hommel, Karl–Göran Thorngren, et al.. (2010). Reducing delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a multi‐factorial intervention study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 54(6). 678–688. 133 indexed citations
19.
Lindholm, Christina, Marco Romanelli, Lena Gunningberg, et al.. (2008). Hip fracture and pressure ulcers – the Pan‐European Pressure Ulcer Study – intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors*. International Wound Journal. 5(2). 315–328. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026